Cited by 79Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsMolecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Large-scale screen for genes controlling mammalian embryogenesis, using high-throughput gene expression analysis in mouse embryos

Open access
Neidhardt, Lorenz, Gasca, Stéphan, Wertz, Karin, Obermayr, Franz, Worpenberg, Susanne, Lehrach, Hans, Herrmann, Bernhard G.·2000·Mechanisms of Development

Abstract

We have adapted the whole-mount in situ hybridization technique to perform high-throughput gene expression analysis in mouse embryos. A large-scale screen for genes showing specific expression patterns in the mid-gestation embryo was carried out, and a large number of genes controlling development were isolated. From 35760 clones of a 9.5 d.p.c. cDNA library, a total of 5348 cDNAs, enriched for rare transcripts, were selected and analyzed by whole-mount in situ hybridization. Four hundred and twenty-eight clones revealed specific expression patterns in the 9.5 d.p.c. embryo. Of 361 tag-sequenced clones, 198 (55%) represent 154 known mouse genes. Thirty-nine (25%) of the known genes are involved in transcriptional regulation and 33 (21%) in inter- or intracellular signaling. A large number of these genes have been shown to play an important role in embryogenesis. Furthermore, 24 (16%) of the known genes are implicated in human disorders and three others altered in classical mouse mutations. Similar proportions of regulators of embryonic development and candidates for human disorders or mouse mutations are expected among the 163 new mouse genes isolated. Thus, high-throughput gene expression analysis is suitable for isolating regulators of embryonic development on a large-scale, and in the long term, for determining the molecular anatomy of the mouse embryo. This knowledge will provide a basis for the systematic investigation of pattern formation, tissue differentiation and org…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0925-4773(00)00453-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neidhardt, L., Gasca, S., Wertz, K., Obermayr, F., Worpenberg, S., Lehrach, H., & Herrmann, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics (DE)
Corresponding author
Herrmann, Bernhard G.
Venue
Mechanisms of Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-11
Volume
98
Issue
1-2
Pages
77-93
ISSN
0925-4773 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039001588
Cited by
79
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
Keywords
embryonic development, mouse embryo, gene expression profiling, whole-mount in situ hybridization, cDNA library screening, transcriptional regulation, signaling pathways, developmental regulators, mouse mutations, human disease genes, pattern formation, organogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Embryonic and Fetal Development, Genetic Testing, Humans, Mutation, In Situ Hybridization, DNA Primers, DNA, Complementary, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review