Cited by 51Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerDevelopmental Biology and Gene RegulationCell death mechanisms and regulation

Drosophila nemo is an essential gene involved in the regulation of programmed cell death

Open access
Mirkovic, Ivana, Charish, Kristi, Gorski, Sharon M, McKnight, Kristen, Verheyen, Esther M·2002·Mechanisms of Development

Abstract

Nemo-like kinases define a novel family of serine/threonine kinases that are involved in integrating multiple signaling pathways. They are conserved regulators of Wnt/Wingless pathways, which may coordinate Wnt with TGFbeta-mediated signaling. Drosophila nemo was identified through its involvement in epithelial planar polarity, a process regulated by a non-canonical Wnt pathway. We have previously found that ectopic expression of Nemo using the Gal4-UAS system resulted in embryonic lethality associated with defects in patterning and head development. In this study we present our analyses of the phenotypes of germline clone-derived embryos. We observe lethality associated with head defects and reduction of programmed cell death and conclude that nmo is an essential gene. We also present data showing that nmo is involved in regulating apoptosis during eye development, based on both loss of function phenotypes and on genetic interactions with the pro-apoptotic gene reaper. Finally, we present genetic data from the adult wing that suggest the activity of ectopically expressed Nemo can be modulated by Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling. Such an observation supports the model that there is cross-talk between Wnt, TGFbeta and JNK signaling at multiple stages of development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00289-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mirkovic, I., Charish, K., Gorski, S. M., McKnight, K., & Verheyen, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
Corresponding author
Verheyen, Esther M
Venue
Mechanisms of Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
119
Issue
1
Pages
9-20
ISSN
0925-4773 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972175683
Cited by
51
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
Keywords
Nemo-like kinase, NEMO, programmed cell death, apoptosis, Drosophila, non-canonical Wnt pathway, TGF-beta signaling, JNK signaling, reaper, eye development, head development, essential genes, signaling crosstalk
MeSH terms
Animals, Crosses, Genetic, Drosophila melanogaster, Epidermis, Heterozygote, Immunohistochemistry, Phenotype, Time Factors, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Cell Death, Apoptosis, Photoreceptor Cells, Invertebrate, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Transgenes, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases, Drosophila Proteins, JNK Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, MAP Kinase Kinase 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review