Cited by 267Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationZebrafish Biomedical Research ApplicationsFish Biology and Ecology Studies

The development of the paired fins in the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Open access
Grandel, Heiner, Schulte-Merker, Stefan·1998·Mechanisms of Development

Abstract

In the present study, we describe the structure and normal development of the zebrafish (Danio rerio) paired fins. Particularly, we focus on the structure of the apical epidermis and on endoskeletal morphogenesis. Endoskeletal development proceeds differently in the pectoral and pelvic fins. Whereas in both fins major parts of the endoskeletal girdle develop within the fin bud mesenchyme, the pattern of chondrogenic condensations observed in the pelvic fins directly reflects the adult endoskeletal pattern. In the pectoral fin, a morphogenetic detour is taken via a functional larval endoskeleton, the endoskeletal disc. It arises in the fin bud mesenchyme from a chondrogenic anlage common with the girdle. The disc chondrifies and represents the functional endoskeleton of the larval pectoral fin. The pectoral fin endoskeleton is expanded as well as restructured during larval stages in a process which involves decomposition of cartilage matrix in the endoskeletal disc. Our comparisons of apical fold morphology with reports on other teleosts and tetrapod apical ridges show them to be homologous on the structural level. Comparisons of endoskeletal development of the zebrafish with reports on teleosts, actinopterygians and chondrichthyans show that endoskeletal morphogenesis in the zebrafish pectoral fin follows a morphogenetic process which is wide-spread among actinopterygians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0925-4773(98)00176-2

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In zebrafish, the AER is involved in larval patterning of the paired fins, while later stages of fin development are organized by an analogous epidermal formation of the fin fold in both paired and unpaired fins.

    “In zebrafish, the AER is involved in larval patterning of the paired fins, while the later stages of fin development are organized by an analogous epidermal formation of the fin fold in both paired and unpaired fins [26],[27].”

    From Zebrafish eda and edar Mutants Reveal Conserved and Ancestral Roles of Ectodysplasin Signaling in Vertebrates (2008) · cites this paper as [26]

    The comparative-analysis section describes the paired-fin apical folds as structurally homologous to tetrapod AERs and says they form much like the embryonic median fin fold. But the Introduction says the organizing centers’ function in zebrafish had not been demonstrated, and the Conclusions say tests of apical-fold function were still under way. The paper therefore does not establish that the AER patterns larval paired fins or that the fin fold organizes later development in both paired and unpaired fins. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Balfour, F.M., 1881. On the development of the skeleton of the paired fins of elasmobranchii, considered in relation to its bearings on the nature of the limbs of the vertebrata. Proc. Zool. Soc. (Lond.) 1881, 656- 671.
  2. Braus, H., 1906. Paarige Extremita ¨ten. In: Hertwig, O. (Ed.), Handbuch der Vergleichenden und Experimentellen Entwicklungslehre der Wir- beltiere. Fischer, Jena, pp. 196-383.
  3. Budgett, J.S., 1902. On the structure of the larval Polypterus. Trans. Zool. Soc. (Lond.) 16, 315-346.
  4. Goel, C., Mathur, J.K., 1977. Morphogenesis in reptilian limbs. In: Ede, D.A., Hinchliffe, J.R., Balls, M. (Eds.), Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 387- 404.
  5. Goodrich, E.S., 1930. Studies on the Structure and Development of Verte- brates. Facsimile of the 1930 edition (1986). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
  6. Hinchliffe, R., 1977. The chondrogenic pattern in chick limb morphogen- esis: a problem of development and evolution. In: Ede, D.A., Hinchliffe, J.R., Balls, M. (Eds.), Vertebrate Limb and Somite Morphogenesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 293-309.
  7. Hinchliffe, J.R., Johnson, D.R., 1980. The Development of the Vertebrate Limb. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  8. Hinchliffe, R., Griffiths, P.J., 1983. The prechondrogenic patterns in tetra- pod limb development and their phylogenetic significance. In: Goodwin, B., Holder, N., and Wylie, C. (Eds.), Development and Evolution. Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 99-121.
  9. Janvier, P., 1996. Early Vertebrates. Monographs on Geology and Geo- physics, no. 33, Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.
  10. Jarvik, E., 1980. Basic Structure and Evolution of Vertebrates. Academic Press, London, Vol.
  11. Jurand, A., 1965. Ultrastructural aspects of early development of the fore- limb buds in the chick and the mouse. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Ser. B 162, 387-405.
  12. Milaire, J., 1965. Aspects of limb morphogenesis in mammals. In: De Haan, R.L., Ursprung, H. (Eds.), Organogenesis. Holt, Reinhart and Winston, New York, pp. 283-300.
  13. Mu ¨ller, G.B., 1991. Evolutionary transformation of limb pattern: hetero- chrony and secondary fusion. In: Hinchliffe, J.R., Hurle, J.M., Summer- bell, D. (Eds.), Developmental patterning of the vertebrate limb. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 395-406.
  14. Roberts, T.R., 1981. Sundasanlangidae, a new family of minute freshwater salmoniform fishes from southeast Asia. Proc. Californian Acad. Sci. 42, 295-302.
  15. Smith, M., Hickman, A., Amanze, D., Lumsden, A., Thorogood, P., 1994. Trunk neural crest origin of caudal fin mesenchyme in the zebrafish Brachydanio rerio. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. B 256, 137-145.
  16. Wiedersheim, R., 1892. Das Gliedmassenskelet der Wirbelthiere. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 160-172.
  17. Zangerl, R., 1981. In: Schultze, H.P. and Kuhn, O. (Eds.), Handbook of Paleoichthyology, Chondrichthyes I. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, Vol. 3A.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grandel, H., & Schulte-Merker, S.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology (DE)
Venue
Mechanisms of Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-12
Volume
79
Issue
1-2
Pages
99-120
ISSN
0925-4773 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062632483
Cited by
267
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
paired fins, zebrafish, pectoral fin, pelvic fin, fin development, Actinopterygii, teleost evolution
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Ectoderm, Embryo, Nonmammalian, Endoderm, Extremities, Larva, Skeleton, Zebrafish

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review