Cited by 319Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Magnetic resonance imaging of hippocampal and amygdala volume in women with childhood abuse and borderline personality disorder

Schmahl, Christian G., Vermetten, Eric, Elzinga, Bernet M., Douglas Bremner, J.·2003·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common disorder associated with emotional dysregulation and other symptoms that have been hypothesized to be related to dysfunction of limbic brain areas including hippocampus and amygdala. The purpose of this study was to measure hippocampal and amygdala volumes in BPD. Hippocampal and amygdala volumes were measured with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 10 patients with BPD and 23 control subjects. Patients with BPD had a 21.9% smaller mean amygdala volume and a 13.1% smaller hippocampal volume, compared to controls. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that alterations in the hippocampus and amygdala are associated with BPD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0925-4927(03)00023-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Magnetic resonance imaging has revealed reductions in amygdala volumes among women who were sexually abused as children.

    “Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has revealed reductions in hippocampus (Bremner 1997, 2003a; Stein 1997), and amygdala (Driessen 2000; Schmahl 2003) volumes as well as deficits in verbal declarative memory measured with neuropsychological testing (Teicher 2000; Heim and Nemeroff 2001) among women who were sexually abused as children.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 25 · Cited by 319

Authors
Schmahl, C. G., Vermetten, E., Elzinga, B. M., & Douglas Bremner, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Schmahl, Christian G.
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
193-198
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2107983778
Cited by
319
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, childhood abuse, hippocampal volume, amygdala volume, limbic system dysfunction, emotional dysregulation, brain structural changes
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Analysis of Variance, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review