Effects of high amphetamine dose on mood and cerebral glucose metabolism in normal volunteers using positron emission tomography (PET)
Abstract
The effects of high euphorigenic doses of D-amphetamine (0.9-1.0 mg/kg p.o.) on regional cerebral glucose metabolism (rCMRglu) and psychological measures were investigated in 10 healthy human volunteers using a within-subject design and [F-18]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and a variety of psychological assessments. At the dose tested, D-amphetamine produced a mania-like syndrome concomitantly with a widespread increase in absolute cerebral metabolism, which was significant in the anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, putamen, and thalamus. An exploratory analysis revealed that: (1) certain aspects of this mania-like syndrome correlated positively with the metabolic changes seen in the frontal cortex, caudate nucleus and putamen; and (2) some of the amphetamine-induced changes in CMRglu correlated with D-amphetamine plasma levels. The present findings of cortical and subcortical increases in cerebral metabolism after D-amphetamine application in humans accord with previous studies in animals, demonstrating that relatively high doses of D-amphetamine (presumably at least 1 mg/kg) are needed to increase cerebral glucose metabolism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of amphetamine on regional cerebral blood flow are dose-dependent: lower doses decrease blood flow in frontal and temporal cortices and striatum, while higher doses increase blood flow in anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, putamen, and thalamus.
“The effects of AMP on regional CBF appear to be dependent on the dose, with lower doses decreasing rates of blood flow in the frontal and temporal cortices and in the striatum (163) and higher doses increasing blood flow in the anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, putamen, and thalamus (160).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 53 · Cited by 83
- Authors
- Vollenweider, F. X., Maguire, R. P., Leenders, K. L., Mathys, K., & Angst, J.
- Affiliations
- Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik Zürich (CH)
- Paul Scherrer Institute (CH)
- University of Bern (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Vollenweider, Franz X
- Venue
- Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 149-162
- ISSN
- 0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168517637
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
- DORA PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
- Keywords
- amphetamine, d-amphetamine, brain glucose metabolism, regional cerebral glucose metabolism, mood, euphoria, anterior cingulate cortex, caudate nucleus, putamen, thalamus, frontal cortex, plasma drug concentration, dose-response relationship, healthy volunteers
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Blood Glucose, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dextroamphetamine, Dominance, Cerebral, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Energy Metabolism, Euphoria, Female, Humans, Male, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review