Enhancement of the performance of Candida saitoana by the addition of glycolchitosan for the control of postharvest decay of apple and citrus fruit
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Glycol chitosan combined with SC and a biocontrol yeast improved control of postharvest decay of apple and citrus fruit.
“Early work by El Ghaouth et al. (2000) showed that glycol chitosan, a water dissolvable chemical formulation of chitosan, combined with SC and a biocontrol yeast improved the control of postharvest decay of apple and citrus fruit.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as El Ghaouth et al., 2000
Both direct and indirect effects (enhanced activity of enzymes such as POD or superoxide dismutase (SOD)) for disease reduction were reported in these studies.
“Both direct and indirect effects (enhanced activity of enzymes such as POD or superoxide dismutase (SOD)) for disease reduction were reported in these studies.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as El Ghaouth et al., 2000
Significant reductions of citrus green or blue molds were obtained in laboratory trials with oranges, lemons, mandarins, or grapefruits artificially inoculated with P. digitatum or P. italicum and treated with chitosan or derivatives such as glycol chitosan.
“Significant reductions of citrus green or blue molds were obtained in laboratory trials with oranges, lemons, mandarins, or grapefruits artificially inoculated with P. digitatum or P. italicum and treated with chitosan or derivatives such as glycol chitosan (El Ghaouth et al., 2000; Chien et al., 2007; Zeng et al., 2010; Panebianco et al., 2014).”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as El Ghaouth et al., 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 189
- Authors
- El-Ghaouth, A., Smilanick, J. L., & Wilson, C. L.
- Affiliations
- Appalachian Fruit Research Laboratory (US)
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Charles L
- ORCID
- Smilanick, Joseph L
- Venue
- Postharvest Biology and Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 0925-5214 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114293018
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Postharvest Biology and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Keywords
- Candida saitoana, chitosan chloride, postharvest decay, apple, citrus, Penicillium expansum, Botrytis cinerea, Penicillium digitatum, green mold, gray mold, blue mold, biological control, spore germination inhibition, sodium carbonate pretreatment, imazalil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review