The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries: A review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Artificial wetlands are an additional option for urban wastewater treatment, but the risk of harboring disease vectors must be mitigated.
“Artificial wetlands are an additional option for urban wastewater treatment [223,224] however, just with other open stagnant water bodies the risk of harboring disease vectors must be mitigated.”
From Urban Stream and Wetland Restoration in the Global South—A DPSIR Analysis (2019) · cites this paper as [223]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 861
- Authors
- Kivaisi, A. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Dar es Salaam (TZ)
- Corresponding author
- Kivaisi, Amelia K
- ORCID
- Kivaisi, Amelia K
- Venue
- Ecological Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 545-560
- ISSN
- 0925-8574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026897863
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 55 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 26.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Engineering (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Hamline University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Wetland Management and Conservation
- Keywords
- constructed wetlands, wastewater treatment, water reuse, developing countries, rural communities, low-cost treatment systems, technology adoption, local expertise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
