The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX
Chomsky, N. (1964) · doi:10.21236/ad0616323 · Cited by 13,587
Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures
Chomsky, N. (1993) · Mouton eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110884166 · Cited by 8,541
Lectures on Government and Binding
Williams, E., & Chomsky, N. (1984) · Language · doi:10.2307/413646 · Cited by 5,136
On Methods in the Analysis of Profile Data
Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289823 · Cited by 4,937
Reading Senseless Sentences: Brain Potentials Reflect Semantic Incongruity
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7350657 · Cited by 4,888
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Linguistic complexity: locality of syntactic dependencies
Gibson, E. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00034-1 · Cited by 2,537
Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association
Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/307161a0 · Cited by 2,218
Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension.
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01560-6 · Cited by 2,124
Cited by
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension?
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299 · Cited by 1,087
Self-citationBrouwer, H., Fitz, H., & Hoeks, J. (2012) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055 · Cited by 625
The linguistic processes underlying the P600
Gouvea, A. C., Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., & Poeppel, D. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960902965951 · Cited by 344
Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning
Rabovsky, M., Hansen, S. S., & McClelland, J. L. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0406-4 · Cited by 290
Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective
Van Berkum, J. J. A., Koornneef, A. W., Otten, M., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.091 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-129
- ISSN
- 0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004845106
- Cited by
- 469
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7
- The paper
- Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00086-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
