The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lateralization of phonetic and pitch discrimination in speech processing
Zatorre, R. J., Evans, A. C., Meyer, E., & Gjedde, A. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.256.5058.846 · Cited by 1,507
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1970) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2284340 · Cited by 945
THE CORTICAL LOCALIZATION OF THE LEXICONS: POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY EVIDENCE
HOWARD, D., PATTERSON, K., WISE, R., BROWN, W. D., FRISTON, K., WEILLER, C., & FRACKOWIAK, R. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.6.1769 · Cited by 585
Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow
Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562843 · Cited by 327
The functional neuroanatomy of novelty processing: integrating ERP and fMRI results
Opitz, B. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.4.379 · Cited by 195
Receptive and expressive language activations for sentences: a PET study
Müller, R.-A., Rothermel, R. D., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Mangner, T. J., & Chugani, H. T. (1997) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199712010-00022 · Cited by 111
Cited by
Price, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 · Cited by 2,159
Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing
Friederici, A. D. (2002) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01839-8 · Cited by 2,231
Self-citationContributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model
Ullman, M. T. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 · Cited by 1,893
Bookheimer, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 · Cited by 1,450
Musical syntax is processed in Broca's area: an MEG study
Maess, B., Koelsch, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/87502 · Cited by 968
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y.
- Venue
- Cognitive Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-33
- ISSN
- 0926-6410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1979105540
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00039-7
- The paper
- Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Cognitive Brain Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-6410(99)00039-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
