The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Integrated signal enhancements in magnetic investigation in archaeology
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Las prospecciones geofísicas y la utilización de sensores remotos, especialmente fotos satelitales y aéreas, han sido tecnologías ampliamente utilizadas en el mundo durante los últimos 50 años y han permitido a los arqueólogos planificar y organizar mejor sus estudios arqueológicos de campo.
“Las prospecciones geofísicas y la utilización de sensores remotos, especialmente las fotos tomadas por satélites y por aviones o avionetas a mediana y baja altura, han sido tecnologías utilizadas ampliamente en el mundo durante los últimos 50 años y las cuales han permitido a los arqueólogos planificar y organizar mejor sus estudios arqueológicos de campo (Sambuelli, Socco y Brecciaroli, 1999;Jeng”
From La utilización de métodos geofísicos en la prospección de un poblado prehispánico quimbaya tardío I en ginebra (valle del cauca, colombia) (2010) · cites this paper as Jeng et al., 2003
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 20
- Ackerman, 1955, The first vertical derivative of gravity, Geophysics, 20, 148, 10.1190/1.1438112 · DOI
- Atchuta Rao, 1981, Interpretation of magnetic anomalies due to dikes: the complex gradient method, Geophysics, 46, 1572, 10.1190/1.1441164 · DOI
- Breiner, 1973, Applications manual for portable magnetometers, GeoMetrics
- Brizzolari, 1994, Integrated geophysical methods in archaeological surveys, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 29, 47, 10.1016/0926-9851(92)90012-A · DOI
- Cammarano, 1997, High-resolution geophysical prospecting with integrated methods. The Ancient Acropolis of Veio (Rome, Italy), Archaeology Prospection, 4, 157, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199712)4:4<157::AID-ARP81>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
- Hsu, 1996, High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potential-field anomalies: an enhanced analytic signal technique, Geophysics, 61, 373, 10.1190/1.1443966 · DOI
- Jeng, 1995, Shallow seismic investigation of a site with poor reflection quality, Geophysics, 60, 1715, 10.1190/1.1443904 · DOI
- Mohan, 1993, Discussion on “Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal” by W.R. Roest, J. Verhoef and M. Pilkington (Geophysics, 57, 116–125), Geophysics, 58, 1214, 10.1190/1.1443507 · DOI
- Mohan, 1995, An analysis of 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 60, 531, 10.1190/1.1443790 · DOI
- Nabighian, 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507, 10.1190/1.1440276 · DOI
- Nabighian, 1974, Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section, Geophysics, 39, 85, 10.1190/1.1440416 · DOI
- Nabighian, 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: fundamental relation, Geophysics, 49, 957, 10.1190/1.1441706 · DOI
- Ofoegbu, 1990, Interpretation of aeromagnetic anomalies over part of southeastern Nigeria using three-dimensional Hilbert transformation, PAGEOPH, 134, 13, 10.1007/BF00878077 · DOI
- Piro, 1996, Integrated geophysical prospecting at Ripa Tetta Neolithic site (Lucera, Foggia-Italy), Archaeological Prospection, 3, 81, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199606)3:2<81::AID-ARP47>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
- Roest, 1992, Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal, Geophysics, 57, 116, 10.1190/1.1443174 · DOI
- Stanley, 1977, Simplified gravity interpretation by gradients—the geological contact, Geophysics, 42, 1230, 10.1190/1.1440787 · DOI
- Tabbagh, 1997, Processing of Z gradiometer magnetic data using linear transforms and analytical signal, Archaeological Prospection, 4, 1, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199703)4:1<1::AID-ARP61>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
- Tsokas, 1992, Two-dimensional inversion filters in magnetic prospecting: application to the exploration for buried antiquities, Geophysics, 57, 1004, 10.1190/1.1443311 · DOI
- Tsokas, 1997, A large-scale magnetic survey in Makrygialos (Pieria), Greece, Archaeology Prospection, 4, 123, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0763(199709)4:3<123::AID-ARP76>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
- Wynn, 1986, Archaeological prospection: an introduction to the special issue, Geophysics, 51, 533, 10.1190/1.1442107 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Armando Rodríguez, C., Zúñiga Escobar, O., & Cuero Guependo, R. (2010) · Boletín de Antropología · doi:10.17533/udea.boan.6709
Metadata
- Authors
- Jeng, Y., Lee, Y.-L., Chen, C.-Y., & Lin, M.-J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Geophysics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-48
- ISSN
- 0926-9851
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
