Cited by 916Risk and Portfolio OptimizationMarkov Chains and Monte Carlo MethodsSimulation Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Monte Carlo Sampling Methods

Shapiro, Alexander·2003·Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0927-0507(03)10006-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Avramidis, 1996, Integrated variance reduction strategies for simulation, Operations Research, 44, 327, 10.1287/opre.44.2.327 · DOI
  2. Bailey, 1999, Response surface analysis of two-stage stochastic linear programming with recourse, Naval Research Logistics, 46, 753, 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6750(199910)46:7<753::AID-NAV1>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  3. Chong, 1993, Optimization of queues using an infinitesimal perturbation analysis-based stochastic algorithm with general update times, SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization, 31, 698, 10.1137/0331032 · DOI
  4. Dai, 2000, Convergence properties of two-stage stochastic programming, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 106, 489, 10.1023/A:1004649211111 · DOI
  5. Dupačová, 1988, Asymptotic behavior of statistical estimators and of optimal solutions of stochastic optimization problems, The Annals of Statistics, 16, 1517, 10.1214/aos/1176351052 · DOI
  6. Ermoliev, 1983, Stochastic quasi-gradient methods and their application to systems optimization, Stochastics, 4, 1, 10.1080/17442508308833246 · DOI
  7. Geyer, 1992, Constrained Monte Carlo maximum likelihood for dependent data, (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 54, 657, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1992.tb01443.x · DOI
  8. Gürkan, 1999, Sample-path solution of stochastic variational inequalities, Mathematical Programming, 21, 313
  9. Higle, 1998, Variance reduction and objective function evaluation in stochatsic linear programs, INFORMS Journal on Computing, 10, 236, 10.1287/ijoc.10.2.236 · DOI
  10. Higle, 1996, Duality and statistical tests of optimality for two stage stochastic programs, Mathematical Programming (Series B), 75, 257, 10.1007/BF02592155 · DOI
  11. Huber, 1967, 1, 221
  12. Kaniovski, 1995, Probabilistic bounds for the solutions of stochastic programming problems, Annals of Operations Research, 56, 189, 10.1007/BF02031707 · DOI
  13. King, 1991, Epi-consistency of convex stochastic programs, Stochastics Stochastics Rep., 34, 83, 10.1080/17442509108833676 · DOI
  14. Kleywegt, 2001, The sample average approximation method for stochastic discrete optimization, SIAM Journal of Optimization, 12, 479, 10.1137/S1052623499363220 · DOI
  15. L'Ecuyer, 1994, Stochastic optimization by simulation: Convergence proofs for the GI/G/1 queue in steady-state, Management Science, 11, 1562, 10.1287/mnsc.40.11.1562 · DOI
  16. Mak, 1999, Monte Carlo bounding techniques for determining solution quality in stochastic programs, Operations Research Letters, 24, 47, 10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00054-6 · DOI
  17. Nevelson, M.B., R.Z. Hasminskii (1976). Stochastic Approximation and Recursive Estimation. American Mathematical Society Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Vol. 47, Rhode Island · DOI
  18. Norkin, 1998, A branch and bound method for stochastic global optimization, Mathematical Programming, 83, 425, 10.1007/BF02680569 · DOI
  19. Pflug, 1998, On the Glivenko Cantelli problem in stochastic programming: Linear recourse, Mathematics of Operations Research, 23, 204, 10.1287/moor.23.1.204 · DOI
  20. Plambeck, 1996, Sample-path optimization of convex stochastic performance functions, Mathematical Programming, Series B, 75, 137, 10.1007/BF02592150 · DOI
  21. Robinson, 1980, Strongly regular generalized equations, Mathematics of Operations Research, 5, 43, 10.1287/moor.5.1.43 · DOI
  22. Robinson, 1982, Generalized equations and their solutions, part ii: Applications to nonlinear programming, Mathematical Programming Study, 19, 200, 10.1007/BFb0120989 · DOI
  23. Robinson, 1992, Normal maps induced by linear transformations, Mathematics of Operations Research, 17, 691, 10.1287/moor.17.3.691 · DOI
  24. Robinson, 1996, Analysis of sample-path optimization, Mathematics of Operations Research, 21, 513, 10.1287/moor.21.3.513 · DOI
  25. Rubinstein, 1990, Optimization of static simulation models by the score function method, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 32, 373, 10.1016/0378-4754(90)90142-6 · DOI
  26. Shapiro, 1991, Asymptotic analysis of stochastic programs, Annals of Operations Research, 30, 169, 10.1007/BF02204815 · DOI
  27. Shapiro, 1996, Simulation-based optimization: Convergence analysis and statistical inference, Stochastic Models, 12, 425, 10.1080/15326349608807393 · DOI
  28. Shapiro, 1998, A simulation-based approach to two-stage stochastic programming with recourse, Mathematical Programming, 81, 301, 10.1007/BF01580086 · DOI
  29. Shapiro, 2000, On rate of convergence of Monte Carlo approximations of stochastic programs, SIAM Journal on Optimization, 11, 70, 10.1137/S1052623498349541 · DOI
  30. Shapiro, A., T. Homem de Mello, J.C. Kim (2002). Conditioning of convex piecewise linear stochastic programs. Mathematical Programming, 94, 1–19 · DOI
  31. Verweij, 2003, The sample average approximation method applied to stochastic routing problems: A computational study, Computational Optimization and Applications, 24, 289, 10.1023/A:1021814225969 · DOI
  32. Wald, 1949, Note on the consistency of the maximum likelihood estimates, Annals Mathematical Statistics, 20, 595, 10.1214/aoms/1177729952 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, A.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Alexander
Venue
Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2003
Pages
353-425
ISSN
0927-0507 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1490324987
Cited by
916
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 50
FWCI
78.42
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Handbooks in operations research and management science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Risk and Portfolio Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
Keywords
sample average approximation, stochastic programming, large-scale optimization, estimator properties, error estimation, variance reduction, multistage stochastic programming, variational inequalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review