The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observability of γ rays from dark matter neutralino annihilations in the Milky Way halo
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Recent advances in N-body simulations of cold dark matter halos point to a substantial density enhancement near the center. This means that, e.g., the γ-ray signals from neutralino dark matter annihilations would be significantly enhanced compared to old estimates based on an isothermal sphere model with large core radius. Another important development concerns new detectors, both space- and ground-based, which will cover the window between 50 and 300 GeV where presently no cosmic γ-ray data are available. Thirdly, new calculations of the γ-ray line signal (a sharp spike of 10−3 relative width) from neutralino annihilations have revealed a hitherto neglected contribution which, for heavy higgsino-like neutralinos, gives an annihilation rate an order of magnitude larger than previously predicted. We make a detailed phenomenological study of the possible detection rates given these three pieces of new information. We show that the proposed upgrade of the Whipple telescope will make it sensitive to a region of parameter space, with substantial improvements possible with the planned new generation of Air Cherenkov Telescope Arrays. We also comment on the potential of the GLAST satellite detector. An evaluation of the continuum γ-rays produced in neutralino annihilations into the main modes is also done. It is shown that a combination of high-rate models and very peaked halo models are already severely constrained by existing data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
Navarro, J. F., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (1996) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/177173 · Cited by 8,544
Cited by
Particle dark matter: evidence, candidates and constraints
Bertone, G., Hooper, D., & Silk, J. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2004.08.031 · Cited by 4,979
Griest, K., & Kamionkowski, M. (2000) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(00)00021-1 · Cited by 1,076
The large-scale structure of the Universe
Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., & White, S. D. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04805 · Cited by 780
Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Albert, A., Atwood, W. B., Baldini, L., Ballet, J., Barbiellini, G., Bastieri, D., Bechtol, K., Bellazzini, R., et al. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.241302 · Cited by 566
Dark matter and collider phenomenology of universal extra dimensions
Hooper, D., & Profumo, S. (2007) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2007.09.003 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Bergström, L., Ullio, P., & Buckley, J. H.
- Venue
- Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-162
- ISSN
- 0927-6505 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146650831
- Cited by
- 575
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observability of γ rays from dark matter neutralino annihilations in the Milky Way halo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0927-6505(98)00015-2
- The paper
- Bergström, L., Ullio, P., & Buckley, J. H. (1998). Observability of γ rays from dark matter neutralino annihilations in the Milky Way halo. Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0927-6505(98)00015-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.