Cited by 170Computational Drug Discovery MethodsDrug Solubulity and Delivery SystemsDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Prediction of intestinal absorption: comparative assessment of gastroplus™ and idea™

Parrott, Neil, Lavé, Thierry·2002·European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Abstract

We have assessed two commercial software tools employing physiologically based models for prediction of intestinal absorption in human. IDEA 2.0 and GASTROPLUS 3.1.0 were compared both in their ability to predict fraction absorbed for a set of 28 drugs and in terms of the functionality offered. The emphasis was placed on the practical usefulness to pharmaceutical drug discovery. Predictions were assessed for three levels of input data (i) pure in silico input, (ii) thermodynamic solubility and in silico permeability, (iii) thermodynamic solubility and human colon carcinoma cell line (CACO-2) permeability. We found the pure in silico prediction ability of the tools to be comparable with 70% correct classification rate. With measured input data the IDEA prediction rate improved to 79% while GASTROPLUS stayed at 70%. In terms of functionality GASTROPLUS is a powerful system for the trained user. Open access to model parameters, diagnostic tools and the ability to integrate data make it particularly suitable for the later stages of discovery and development. IDEA is web based and presents a simple interface suitable for widespread use with minimal training. However the limited functionality and inconvenient handling of multiple compound batches currently restrict the usefulness of version 2.0 for drug discovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0928-0987(02)00132-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 170

Authors
Parrott, N., & Lavé, T.
Affiliations
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (CH)
Corresponding author
Parrott, Neil
Venue
European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
17
Issue
1-2
Pages
51-61
ISSN
0928-0987 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008286529
Cited by
170
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Drug Solubulity and Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, GastroPlus, software comparison, fraction absorbed, Caco-2 permeability, thermodynamic solubility, drug discovery, web-based prediction tool
MeSH terms
Pharmaceutical Preparations, Intestinal Absorption, Predictive Value of Tests, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review