Cited by 53

Prediction of postoperative morbidity after lung resection using an artificial neural network ensemble

Santos-Garcı́a, Gustavo, Varela, Gonzalo, Novoa, Nuria, Jiménez, Marcelo F·2004·Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Abstract

Objective To propose an ensemble model of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict cardio-respiratory morbidity after pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Prospective clinical study was based on 489 NSCLC operated cases. An artificial neural network ensemble was developed using a training set of 348 patients undergoing lung resection between 1994 and 1999. Predictive variables used were: sex of the patient, age, body mass index, ischemic heart disease, cardiac arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, induction chemotherapy, extent of resection, chest wall resection, perioperative blood transfusion, tumour staging, forced expiratory volume in 1s percent (FEV(1)%), and predicted postoperative FEV(1)% (ppoFEV(1)%). The analysed outcome was the occurrence of postoperative cardio-respiratory complications prospectively recorded and codified. The artificial neural network ensemble consists of 100 backpropagation networks combined via a simple averaging method. The probabilities of complication calculated by ensemble model were obtained to the actual occurrence of complications in 141 cases operated on between January 2000 and December 2001 and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for this method was constructed. Results The prevalence of cardio-respiratory morbidity was 0.25 in the training and 0.30 in the validation series. The accuracy for morbidity prediction (area under the ROC curve) was 0.98 by the ensemble model. Conclusion In this series…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0933-3657(03)00059-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Santos-Garcı́a, G., Varela, G., Novoa, N., & Jiménez, M. F.
Venue
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
61-69
ISSN
0933-3657
Cited by
53
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review