Cited by 331Phytochemicals and Medicinal PlantsMedicinal Plant Extracts EffectsMedicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds

Anxiolytic-antidepressant activity of Withania somnifera glycowithanolides: an experimental study

Bhattacharya, S.K., Bhattacharya, A., Sairam, K., Ghosal, S.·2000·Phytomedicine

Abstract

The roots of Withania somnifera (WS) are used extensively in Ayurveda, the classical Indian system of medicine, and WS is categorized as a rasayana, which are used to promote physical and mental health, to provide defence against disease and adverse environmental factors and to arrest the aging process. WS has been used to stabilize mood in patients with behavioural disturbances. The present study investigated the anxiolytic and antidepressant actions of the bioactive glycowithanolides (WSG), isolated from WS roots, in rats. WSG (20 and 50 mg/kg) was administered orally once daily for 5 days and the results were compared by those elicited by the benzodiazepine lorazepam (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) for anxiolytic studies, and by the tricyclic anti-depressant, imipramine (10 mg/kg, i.p.), for the antidepressant investigations. Both these standard drugs were administered once, 30 min prior to the tests. WSG induced an anxiolytic effect, comparable to that produced by lorazepam, in the elevated plus-maze, social interaction and feeding latency in an unfamiliar environment, tests. Further, both WSG and lorazepam, reduced rat brain levels of tribulin, an endocoid marker of clinical anxiety, when the levels were increased following administration of the anxiogenic agent, pentylenetetrazole. WSG also exhibited an antidepressant effect, comparable with that induced by imipramine, in the forced swim-induced 'behavioural despair' and 'learned helplessness' tests. The investigations support the use of WS as a mood stabilizer in clinical conditions of anxiety and depression in Ayurveda.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0944-7113(00)80030-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 331

Authors
Bhattacharya, S. K., Bhattacharya, A., Sairam, K., & Ghosal, S.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Corresponding author
Bhattacharya, S.K.
Venue
Phytomedicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-12
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
463-469
ISSN
0944-7113 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964294117
Cited by
331
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
7.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Phytomedicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Phytochemicals and Medicinal Plants
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Medicinal Plants and Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
Withania somnifera, anxiolytic effects, antidepressant effects, anxiety, depression, Ayurveda, Rasayana, elevated plus maze, social interaction, feeding latency, pentylenetetrazole, forced swim test, learned helplessness, imipramine, lorazepam
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Brain, Ergosterol, Isatin, Lactones, Male, Medicine, Ayurvedic, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors, Plant Extracts, Social Behavior, Stress, Physiological, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Maze Learning, Withania, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review