The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The next release problem
Abstract
Companies developing and maintaining complex software systems need to determine the features that should be added to their system as part of the next release. They will wish to select these features to ensure the demands of their client base are satisfied as much as possible while at the same time ensuring that they themselves have the resources to undertake the necessary development. This situation is modelled in this paper and the problem of selecting an optimal next release is shown to be NP-hard. The use of various modern heuristics to find a high quality but possibly suboptimal solution is described. Comparative studies of these heuristics are given for various test cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1699114 · Cited by 37,192
Metadata
- Authors
- Bagnall, A. J., Rayward-Smith, V. J., & Whittley, I. M.
- Venue
- Information and Software Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 883-890
- ISSN
- 0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2012007091
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
