Cited by 249Risk and Safety AnalysisRisk Perception and ManagementProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

Aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in probability elicitation with an example from hazardous waste management

Hora, Stephen C.·1996·Reliability Engineering & System Safety

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0951-8320(96)00077-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uncertainty in data-driven decision-making systems may stem from different sources and thus communicate different information to stakeholders.

    “Broadly, uncertainty in datadriven decision-making systems may stem from different sources and thus communicate different information to stakeholders [36,52].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hora, S. C.
Affiliations
University of Hawaii at Hilo (US)
Corresponding author
Hora, Stephen C.
Venue
Reliability Engineering & System Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-11
Volume
54
Issue
2-3
Pages
217-223
ISSN
0951-8320 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069266605
Cited by
249
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Reliability Engineering & System Safety (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Risk and Safety Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Keywords
aleatoric uncertainty, epistemic uncertainty, probability elicitation, expert opinion, risk assessment, hazardous waste management, hazardous waste disposal, uncertainty classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review