Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: reconsideration of traditional contraindications
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The strict limiting criteria for the use of metformin in diabetes mellitus stem largely from reports, in the 1970s, of mortality and lactic acidosis associated with phenformin. Data about metformin are less clear and are based mainly on case reports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of continued use of metformin in patients with contraindications to this agent. PATIENTS: Some 393 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (serum creatinine 130-220 &mgr;mol/l) were studied. Among them were 266 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), 94 with congestive heart failure (CHF), and 91 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), all of whom had been treated with metformin. The patients were randomized to either continue or to stop metformin and were then followed for 4 years. RESULTS: Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The patients who stopped taking metformin showed a rise in body mass index and in hemoglobin A1c significantly greater than those who continued the drug. There were no cases of lactic acidosis. Lactic acid values did not differ in the two groups and correlated only with serum creatinine and body mass index. Microvascular diabetic complications, cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular and total mortality were identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients who are treated with metformin and who tolerate the drug well may continue taking it, even when mild renal impairment develops, possibly up to serum creatinine levels of 220 &mgr;mol/l. There is also no apparent reason why patients with CHD, CHF, and COPD should discontinue metformin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a prospective 4-year study of 393 metformin-treated patients with elevated serum creatinine and coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, there were no differences between continuing and discontinuing metformin in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, rate of myocardial infarction, or rate of cardiovascular events.
“There were no differences between groups in all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, rate of myocardial infarction, or rate of cardiovascular events [84].”
From Metformin: An Old But Still the Best Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [84]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Rachmani, R., Slavachevski, I., Levi, Z., Zadok, B.-S., Kedar, Y., & Ravid, M.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Ravid, Mordchai
- ORCID
- Levi, Zohar
- Venue
- European Journal of Internal Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 428-433
- ISSN
- 0953-6205 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994030315
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- European Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Keywords
- metformin, type 2 diabetes, renal dysfunction, serum creatinine, lactic acidosis, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, glycemic control, body mass index, microvascular complications, cardiovascular mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review