The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complementary roles of basal ganglia and cerebellum in learning and motor control
Abstract
The classical notion that the basal ganglia and the cerebellum are dedicated to motor control has been challenged by the accumulation of evidence revealing their involvement in non-motor, cognitive functions. From a computational viewpoint, it has been suggested that the cerebellum, the basal ganglia, and the cerebral cortex are specialized for different types of learning: namely, supervised learning, reinforcement learning and unsupervised learning, respectively. This idea of learning-oriented specialization is helpful in understanding the complementary roles of the basal ganglia and the cerebellum in motor control and cognitive functions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In particular, learning in the cerebellum is driven by error signals (Doya, 2000; Hikosaka et al., 2002).”
From The Forward Model: A Unifying Theory for the Role of the Cerebellum in Motor Control and Sense of Agency (2021) · cites this paper as Doya, 2000
Citations
Cites
A neural substrate of prediction and reward
Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5306.1593 · Cited by 9,388
Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images
Olshausen, B. A., & Field, D. J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381607a0 · Cited by 5,694
Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons
Schultz, W. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 · Cited by 4,564
Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing
Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l · Cited by 4,131
Marr, D. (1969) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008820 · Cited by 3,253
Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.
Kawato, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(99)00028-8 · Cited by 2,685
A theory of cerebellar function
Albus, J. S. (1971) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(71)90051-4 · Cited by 2,539
Internal models in the cerebellum
Wolpert, D. M., Miall, R. C., & Kawato, M. (1998) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01221-2 · Cited by 2,469
The cerebellum and neural control
Ito, M. (1984) · Cited by 2,314
Barto, A. (1998) · IFAC Proceedings Volumes · doi:10.1016/s1474-6670(17)38315-5 · Cited by 2,172
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hikosaka, 1983, Visual and oculomotor functions of monkey Macaca mulatta substantia nigra pars reticulata, J Physiol, 49, 1230
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Recent advances in physical reservoir computing: A review
Tanaka, G., Yamane, T., Héroux, J. B., Nakane, R., Kanazawa, N., Takeda, S., Numata, H., Nakano, D., & Hirose, A. (2019) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2019.03.005 · Cited by 2,146
Habits, Rituals, and the Evaluative Brain
Graybiel, A. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112851 · Cited by 1,697
Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model
Ullman, M. T. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008 · Cited by 1,893
Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control
Scott, S. H. (2004) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1427 · Cited by 1,073
Central mechanisms of motor skill learning
Hikosaka, O., Nakamura, K., Sakai, K., & Nakahara, H. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00307-0 · Cited by 1,023
Metadata
- Authors
- Doya, K.
- Affiliations
- Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Doya, K
- ORCID
- Doya, K
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 732-739
- ISSN
- 0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060052647
- Cited by
- 964
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 36
- FWCI
- 1.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Keywords
- basal ganglia, cerebellum, motor control, learning, supervised learning, reinforcement learning, unsupervised learning, cognitive function, cerebral cortex, computational neuroscience
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Basal Ganglia, Cerebellum, Humans, Learning, Motor Neurons, Movement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
