The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity
Open accessAbstract
Since the discovery of orientation selectivity by Hubel and Wiesel, the mechanisms responsible for this remarkable operation in the visual cortex have been controversial. Experimental studies over the past year have highlighted the contribution of feedforward thalamo-cortical afferents, as proposed originally by Hubel and Wiesel, but they have also indicated that this contribution alone is insufficient to account for the sharp orientation tuning observed in the visual cortex. Recent advances in understanding the functional architecture of local cortical circuitry have led to new proposals for the involvement of intracortical recurrent excitation and inhibition in orientation selectivity. Establishing how these two mechanisms work together remains an important experimental and theoretical challenge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Jones, J. P., & Palmer, L. A. (1987) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1987.58.6.1233 · Cited by 1,658
A functional microcircuit for cat visual cortex
Douglas, R. J., & Martin, K. A. (1991) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018733 · Cited by 736
Orientation selectivity in the cat's striate cortex is invariant with stimulus contrast
Sclar, G., & Freeman, R. D. (1982) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00238641 · Cited by 339
Tsumoto, T., Eckart, W., & Creutzfeldt, O. D. (1979) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00235678 · Cited by 302
Skottun, B. C., Bradley, A., Sclar, G., Ohzawa, I., & Freeman, R. D. (1987) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1987.57.3.773 · Cited by 298
Orientation selectivity of cortical neurons during intracellular blockade of inhibition
Nelson, S., Toth, L., Sheth, B., & Sur, M. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8047882 · Cited by 254
Cited by
Highly selective receptive fields in mouse visual cortex
Niell, C. M., & Stryker, M. P. (2008) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0623-08.2008 · Cited by 1,081
Neural Mechanisms of Orientation Selectivity in the Visual Cortex
Ferster, D., & Miller, K. D. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.441 · Cited by 678
Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence
Ringach, D. L., Shapley, R. M., & Hawken, M. J. (2002) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.22-13-05639.2002 · Cited by 649
Self-citationThe Contribution of Noise to Contrast Invariance of Orientation Tuning in Cat Visual Cortex
Anderson, J. S., Lampl, I., Gillespie, D. C., & Ferster, D. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5498.1968 · Cited by 422
Inhibition, Spike Threshold, and Stimulus Selectivity in Primary Visual Cortex
Priebe, N. J., & Ferster, D. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.005 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Sompolinsky, H., & Shapley, R.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 514-522
- ISSN
- 0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975252397
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80031-1
- The paper
- Sompolinsky, H., & Shapley, R. (1997). New perspectives on the mechanisms for orientation selectivity. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80031-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
