Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 982

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival

Open access
Ogston, Keith N, Miller, Iain D, Payne, Simon, Hutcheon, Andrew W, Sarkar, Tarun K, Smith, Ian, Schofield, A, Heys, Steven D·2003·The Breast

Abstract

The clinical and complete pathological response of a primary breast cancer to chemotherapy has been shown to be an important prognostic for survival. However, the majority of patients do not experience a complete pathological response to primary chemotherapy and the significance of lesser degrees of histological response is uncertain and the prognostic significance is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy and to determine if such a system has prognostic value.A consecutive series of 176 patients with large (> or =4cm) and locally advanced breast cancers were treated with multimodality therapy comprising primary chemotherapy, surgery, radiotherapy and tamoxifen. All underwent assessment of the primary breast tumour before and after completion of chemotherapy. Residual tumour was excised after completion of chemotherapy (mastectomy or wide local excision with axillary surgery). The removed tissue was assessed and response to chemotherapy graded using a five-point histological grading system based with the fundamental feature being a reduction in tumour cellularity; comparison being made with a pre-treatment core biopsy. All patients were followed up for 5 years or more. Pathological responses were compared to 5 year overall survival and disease-free survival using log rank tests. The overall 5-year survival for all patients was 71%, and 5 year disease free interval was 60%. There was a significant correlation between pathological response using this new grading system and both overall survival (P=0.02) and disease-free interval (P=0.04). In a multivariate analysis of known prognostic factors, the Miller/Payne grading system was an independent predictor of overall patient survival. This grading system, which assesses the histological response to primary chemotherapy, can predict overall survival and disease-free interval in patients with large and locally advanced breast cancers treated with such therapy. The relationship of degree of histological response to overall and disease-free survival has been shown in univariate and multivariate analyses and could potentially have an important role in the clinical management of patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing primary chemotherapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00106-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 982

Metadata

Authors
Ogston, K. N., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Hutcheon, A. W., Sarkar, T. K., Smith, I., Schofield, A., & Heys, S. D.
Venue
The Breast
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
320-327
ISSN
0960-9776 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050761481
Cited by
982
References
0
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00106-1
The paper
Ogston, K. N., Miller, I. D., Payne, S., Hutcheon, A. W., Sarkar, T. K., Smith, I., Schofield, A., & Heys, S. D. (2003). A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. The Breast. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00106-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.