The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition
Open accessAbstract
Background Recognizing an object is improved by recent experience with that object even if one cannot recall seeing the object. This perceptual facilitation as a result of previous experience is called priming. In neuroimaging studies, priming is often associated with a decrease in activation in brain regions involved in object recognition. It is thought that this occurs because priming causes a sharpening of object representations which leads to more efficient processing and, consequently, a reduction in neural activity. Recent evidence has suggested, however, that the apparent effect of priming on brain activation may vary as a function of whether the neural activity is measured before or after recognition has taken place. Results Using a gradual 'unmasking' technique, we presented primed and non-primed objects to subjects, and measured activation time courses using high-field functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). As the objects were slowly revealed, but before recognition had occurred, activation increased from baseline level to a peak that corresponded in time to the subjects' behavioural recognition responses. The activation peak for primed objects occurred sooner than the peak for non-primed objects, and subjects responded sooner when presented with a primed object than with a non-primed object. During this pre-recognition phase, primed objects produced more activation than non-primed objects. After recognition, activation declined rapidly for both primed and no…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Binding occurs in both conscious and unconscious processing.
“Indeed, binding occurs in both conscious and unconscious processing. For example, unconscious priming can occur at the object level (James et al., 2000), suggesting that parts can be bound into wholes unconsciously.”
From Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness (2021) · cites this paper as James et al., 2000
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 164
- Authors
- James, T. W., Humphrey, G. K., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- Robarts Research Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- James, Thomas W.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1017-1024
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169939578
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- object recognition, brain activation, response latency, object representation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review