The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Closest Unicellular Relatives of Animals
Open accessAbstract
Molecular phylogenies support a common ancestry between animals (Metazoa) and Fungi, but the evolutionary descent of the Metazoa from single-celled eukaryotes (protists) and the nature and taxonomic affiliation of these ancestral protists remain elusive. We addressed this question by sequencing complete mitochondrial genomes from taxonomically diverse protists to generate a large body of molecular data for phylogenetic analyses. Trees inferred from multiple concatenated mitochondrial protein sequences demonstrate that animals are specifically affiliated with two morphologically dissimilar unicellular protist taxa: Monosiga brevicollis (Choanoflagellata), a flagellate, and Amoebidium parasiticum (Ichthyosporea), a fungus-like organism. Statistical evaluation of competing evolutionary hypotheses confirms beyond a doubt that Choanoflagellata and multicellular animals share a close sister group relationship, originally proposed more than a century ago on morphological grounds. For the first time, our trees convincingly resolve the currently controversial phylogenetic position of the Ichthyosporea, which the trees place basal to Choanoflagellata and Metazoa but after the divergence of Fungi. Considering these results, we propose the new taxonomic group Holozoa, comprising Ichthyosporea, Choanoflagellata, and Metazoa. Our findings provide insight into the nature of the animal ancestor and have broad implications for our understanding of the evolutionary transition from unicellular protists to multicellular animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences
Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. (1992) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/8.3.275 · Cited by 7,003
PAML: a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood
Yang, Z. (1997) · Computer applications in the biosciences · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/13.5.555 · Cited by 5,377
Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively Misleading
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401 · Cited by 3,261
An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection
Shimodaira, H. (2002) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150290069913 · Cited by 2,791
Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies
Strimmer, K., & von Haeseler, A. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025664 · Cited by 2,531
Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading.
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412923 · Cited by 2,230
CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection
Shimodaira, H., & Hasegawa, M. (2001) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246 · Cited by 2,049
[5] Rapid and sensitive sequence comparison with FASTP and FASTA
Pearson, W. R. (1990) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/0076-6879(90)83007-v · Cited by 1,934
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yang, 1997, Paml, Comput. Appl. Biosci., 13, 555
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny
James, T. Y., Kauff, F., Schoch, C. L., Matheny, P. B., Hofstetter, V., Cox, C. J., Celio, G. J., Gueidan, C., Fraker, E., Miądlikowska, J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05110 · Cited by 1,844
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Lane, C. E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S. S., Brown, M. W., Burki, F., Dunthorn, M., Hampl, V., et al. (2012) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Cited by 1,680
A Bayesian Mixture Model for Across-Site Heterogeneities in the Amino-Acid Replacement Process
Lartillot, N., & Philippe, H. (2004) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msh112 · Cited by 1,516
Gregoretti, I., Lee, Y.-M., & Goodson, H. V. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.006 · Cited by 1,456
Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life
Delsuc, F., Brinkmann, H., & Philippe, H. (2005) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1603 · Cited by 1,264
Metadata
- Authors
- Lang, B. F., O'Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M. W., & Burger, G.
- Affiliations
- Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CA)
- American Type Culture Collection (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burger, G.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1773-1778
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999681000
- Semantic Scholar
- 26c2303c5a2ec3062bf9727ca5b9a6cfeda5155c
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 7.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Protist diversity and phylogeny
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- animal origins, Choanoflagellata, Ichthyosporea, Monosiga brevicollis, mitochondrial genome, evolution of multicellularity, protist phylogeny
- MeSH terms
- Animals, DNA, Mitochondrial, Biological Evolution, Fungi, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Plants, Eukaryota
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
