Cited by 164Neuroscience and Music PerceptionMultisensory perception and integrationTactile and Sensory Interactions

Neural Processing of Auditory Looming in the Human Brain

Open access
Seifritz, Erich, Neuhoff, John G., Bilecen, Deniz, Scheffler, Klaus, Mustovic, Henrietta, Schächinger, Hartmut, Elefante, Raffaele, Di Salle, Francesco·2002·Current Biology

Abstract

Acoustic intensity change, along with interaural, spectral, and reverberation information, is an important cue for the perception of auditory motion. Approaching sound sources produce increases in intensity, and receding sound sources produce corresponding decreases. Human listeners typically overestimate increasing compared to equivalent decreasing sound intensity and underestimate the time to contact of approaching sound sources. These characteristics could provide a selective advantage by increasing the margin of safety for response to looming objects. Here, we used dynamic intensity and functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine the neural underpinnings of the perceptual priority for rising intensity. We found that, consistent with activation by horizontal and vertical auditory apparent motion paradigms, rising and falling intensity activated the right temporal plane more than constant intensity. Rising compared to falling intensity activated a distributed neural network subserving space recognition, auditory motion perception, and attention and comprising the superior temporal sulci and the middle temporal gyri, the right temporoparietal junction, the right motor and premotor cortices, the left cerebellar cortex, and a circumscribed region in the midbrain. This anisotropic processing of acoustic intensity change may reflect the salience of rising intensity produced by looming sources in natural environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01356-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Human PMV is responsive to auditory stimulation, being activated by looming sounds alone or when coupled with tactile stimulation to the hand.

    “The human PMV is also responsive to auditory stimulation, being activated both by looming sounds alone (Seifritz et al. 2002), or when coupled with tactile stimulation to the hand (Ferri et al. 2015).”

    From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Seifritz et al. 2002

    The Results and Discussion (pp. 1–2) report greater activation in right precentral and lateral premotor regions for rising than falling sound intensity, supporting a response to auditory looming sounds alone. The paper does not identify the activated premotor region specifically as ventral premotor cortex (PMV). The tactile-stimulation finding is attributed to Ferri et al., not to this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Lower-level auditory regions such as the auditory belt regions in the planum temporale exhibit a preference for rising sounds, which correspond to sounds approaching the boundaries of PPS.

    “Notably, lower-level auditory regions such as the auditory belt regions located in the planum temporale (PT) exhibit a preference for rising sounds, which correspond to sounds approaching the boundaries of PPS (Warren et al. 2002; Seifritz et al. 2002; Warren and Griffiths 2003; Krumbholz et al. 2005).”

    From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Seifritz et al. 2002

    The Summary (p. 1) says increasing intensity signals an approaching source, and the Results and Discussion (p. 1) report stronger responses to rising than falling intensity in the superior temporal sulci and middle temporal gyri. The paper reports that the right temporal plane responds to both rising and falling intensity relative to constant intensity; it does not establish a rising-sound preference specifically in auditory belt regions of the planum temporale or relate the sounds to PPS boundaries. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The superior temporal sulcus is activated by auditory looming stimuli and is involved in multisensory integration, containing visual neurons responding to the sight of movement.

    “The superior temporal sulcus (STS), along with being activated by auditory looming stimuli (Seifritz et al. 2002; Hall and Moore 2003; Bach et al. 2009), is involved in multi-sensory integration, as it contains visual neurons responding to the sight of movement (Beauchamp et al. 2004; Barraclough et al. 2005; Huang et al. 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 41 · Cited by 164

Authors
Seifritz, E., Neuhoff, J. G., Bilecen, D., Scheffler, K., Mustovic, H., Schächinger, H., Elefante, R., & Di Salle, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • College of Wooster (US)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
Corresponding author
Seifritz, Erich
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-12
Volume
12
Issue
24
Pages
2147-2151
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978664218
Cited by
164
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
auditory motion perception, time-to-contact, superior temporal sulcus, middle temporal gyrus, temporoparietal junction, cerebellar cortex, midbrain, attention
MeSH terms
Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychoacoustics, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review