The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Systematic identification of mitotic phosphoproteins
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) are thought to initiate and coordinate cell division processes by sequentially phosphorylating key targets; in most cases these substrates remain unidentified. RESULTS Using a screen that scores for phosphorylation of proteins, which were translated from pools of cDNA plasmids in vitro, by either phosphoepitope antibody recognition or electrophoretic mobility shifts, we have identified 20 mitotically phosphorylated proteins from Xenopus embryos, 15 of which have sequence similarity to other proteins. Of these proteins, five have previously been shown to be phosphorylated during mitosis (epithelial-microtubule associated protein-115, Oct91, Elongation factor 1gamma, BRG1 and Ribosomal protein L18A), five are related to proteins postulated to have roles in mitosis (epithelial-microtubule associated protein-115, Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cdc5, innercentrosome protein, BRG1 and the RNA helicase WM6), and nine are related to transcription factors (BRG1, negative co-factor 2alpha, Oct91, S. pombe Cdc5, HoxD1, Sox3, Vent2, and two isoforms of Xbr1b). Of 16 substrates tested, 14 can be directly phosphorylated in vitro by the mitotic CDK, cyclin B-Cdc2, although three of these may be physiological substrates of other kinases activated during mitosis. CONCLUSIONS Examination of this broad set of mitotic phosphoproteins has allowed us to draw three conclusions about how the activation of CDKs regulates cell-cycle events. First, Cdc2 itself appears to directly phosphorylate most of the mitotic phosphoproteins. Second, during mitosis most of the substrates are phosphorylated more than once and a number may be targets of multiple kinases, suggesting combinatorial regulation. Third, the large fraction of mitotic phosphoproteins that are presumptive transcription factors, two of which have been previously shown to dissociate from DNA during mitosis, suggests that an important function of mitotic phosphorylation is to strip the chromatin of proteins associated with gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation
Dephoure, N., Zhou, C., Villén, J., Beausoleil, S. A., Bakalarski, C. E., Elledge, S. J., & Gygi, S. P. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805139105 · Cited by 1,608
Exploring the Functional Interactions between Aurora B, INCENP, and Survivin in Mitosis
Honda, R., Körner, R., & Nigg, E. A. (2003) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e02-11-0769 · Cited by 508
Epsin is an EH-domain-binding protein implicated in clathrin-mediated endocytosis
Chen, H., Fre, S., Slepnev, V. I., Capua, M. R., Takei, K., Butler, M. H., Di Fiore, P. P., & De Camilli, P. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29555 · Cited by 425
The Ki-67 Protein: Fascinating Forms and an Unknown Function
Endl, E., & Gerdes, J. (2000) · Experimental Cell Research · doi:10.1006/excr.2000.4888 · Cited by 379
Shen, M., Stukenberg, P. T., Kirschner, M. W., & Lu, K. P. (1998) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.12.5.706 · Cited by 340
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stukenberg, P. T., Lustig, K. D., McGarry, T. J., King, R. W., Kuang, J., & Kirschner, M. W.
- Venue
- Current Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 338-348
- ISSN
- 0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972377722
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic identification of mitotic phosphoproteins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00157-6
- The paper
- Stukenberg, P. T., Lustig, K. D., McGarry, T. J., King, R. W., Kuang, J., & Kirschner, M. W. (1997). Systematic identification of mitotic phosphoproteins. Current Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00157-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.