Cited by 161Cellular transport and secretionProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

ARF and PITP restore GTPγS-stimulated protein secretion from cytosol-depleted HL60 cells by promoting PIP2 synthesis

Open access
Fensome, Amanda, Cunningham, Emer, Prosser, Simon, Khoon Tan, Siow, Swigart, Philip, Thomas, Geraint, Hsuan, Justin, Cockcroft, Shamshad·1996·Current Biology

Abstract

Background In many cell types, including neutrophils and HL60 cells, there is an absolute requirement for a GTP-dependent step to elicit Ca(2+)-regulated secretion. Neutrophils and HL60 cells secrete lysosomal enzymes from azurophilic granules; this secretion is inhibited by 1% ethanol, indicating that phosphatidate (PA) produced by phospholipase D (PLD) activity may be involved. PLD can use primary alcohols in preference to water during the hydrolytic step, generating the corresponding phosphatidylalcohol instead of PA, its normal product. As ARF (ADP-ribosylation factor) proteins regulate PLD activity and are implicated in constitutive vesicular traffic, we have investigated whether ARF is also required for GTP-dependent secretion in HL60 cells. Results We have used a cell-permeabilization protocol that allows HL60 cells to become refractory to stimulation with GTP gamma S plus 10 microM Ca2+ with regard to secretion and PLD activity. Permeabilization with streptolysin O for 10 minutes permitted the loss of freely diffusable cytosolic proteins, including ARF proteins. Fractions derived from brain cytosol, enriched in ARF proteins, restored secretory function and PLD activity. The major contaminating protein present in these ARF-enriched fractions was identified as phosphatidylinositol transfer protein (PITP). Unexpectedly, PITP was also found to restore GTP gamma S-dependent secretion. Restoration of secretory function was characterized using recombinant proteins, rARF1 and…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0960-9822(09)00454-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fensome, A., Cunningham, E., Prosser, S., Khoon Tan, S., Swigart, P., Thomas, G., Hsuan, J., & Cockcroft, S.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-06
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
730-738
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151954246
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Royal Society
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
ADP-ribosylation factor, phosphatidylinositol transfer protein, phospholipase D, phosphatidic acid, exocytosis, HL-60 cells, lysosomal enzyme release, phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase
MeSH terms
Animals, Calcium, Carrier Proteins, Cytosol, Humans, Membrane Proteins, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Tumor Cells, Cultured, Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate), HL-60 Cells, GTP-Binding Proteins, Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-Diphosphate, ADP-Ribosylation Factors, ADP-Ribosylation Factor 1, Phospholipid Transfer Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review