Quantity and quality of harvestable biomass from Populus short rotation coppice for solid fuel use—a review of the physiological basis and management influences
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 237
- Authors
- Kauter, D., Lewandowski, I., & Claupein, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Hohenheim (DE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kauter, Dirk
- ORCID
- Lewandowski, Iris
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 411-427
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2006556357
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
- Keywords
- poplar, short rotation coppice, woody biomass, solid biofuels, biomass quality, biomass yield, moisture content, nitrogen content, potassium content, heavy metals, mean annual increment, rotation length, aspen, site requirements, weed control, biomass storage, Central Europe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
