Clonal variability in biomass production and conversion efficiency of poplar during the establishment year of a short rotation coppice plantation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Productivity values of the first rotation period are generally lower than for subsequent rotations due to early establishment from unrooted cuttings and initial root development.
“However productivity values of the first rotation period are generally lower than for subsequent rotations due to the early establishment from unrooted cuttings and the initial root development [31].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 15 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Deraedt, W., & Ceulemans, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Antwerp (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Deraedt, W
- ORCID
- Ceulemans, R
- Venue
- Biomass and Bioenergy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 391-398
- ISSN
- 0961-9534 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004644613
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biomass and Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Keywords
- poplar, poplar clones, clonal variation, short rotation coppice, biomass production, conversion efficiency, carbon content, net photosynthetic rate, carboxylation efficiency, growing season length, plant mortality, carbon uptake, waste disposal sites
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
