Cited by 88Coffee research and impactsFood and Agricultural SciencesAgricultural and Biological Research

Caffeine content in coffee as influenced by grinding and brewing techniques

Bell, Leonard N., Wetzel, Clinton R., Grand, Alexandra N.·1996·Food Research International

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0963-9969(97)00002-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 88

Authors
Bell, L. N., Wetzel, C. R., & Grand, A. N.
Affiliations
Auburn University (US)
Corresponding author
Bell, Leonard N.
Venue
Food Research International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
785-789
ISSN
0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2066215172
Cited by
88
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Research International (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
Keywords
caffeine, coffee, coffee preparation methods, coffee grinding, coffee brewing, filtered coffee, boiled coffee, food composition data, caffeine consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review