Muscle activation characteristics of stance balance control in children with spastic cerebral palsy
Abstract
Two studies were conducted to investigate muscle recruitment of children with spastic cerebral palsy in response to unexpected perturbation of balance in stance. The aim of the studies was to investigate neural and non-neural mechanical contributions to muscle responses differences these children display when maintaining balance. In the first study, muscle responses of children with spastic diplegia were compared to typically developing children with similar levels of walking experience. Each child stood on a moveable platform that was displaced backward. Electromyographic recordings of posterior agonist and anterior antagonist muscles of the legs and trunk were analyzed and compared to those of normal children who had obtained a similar developmental levels of mobility. Children with spastic cerebral palsy were found to have an increase in antagonist recruitment and decreased trunk activation when compared to typically developing children at the same level of walking experience. Developmental trends were noted to be similar in all children with or without pathology. As children gained independent walking skills, they demonstrated shorter onset latencies in leg and thigh muscles. In the second study, older children with no pathology were perturbed in crouch stance, simulating the posture of their matched children with cerebral palsy. Changes in their muscle responses were observed to more clearly approximate the muscle onset latency organization of children with spastic diplegia. Results of these studies suggest that muscle recruitment differences for balance control in children with spasticity are due to CNS deficits as well as mechanical changes in posture. Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Children with CP show deficits in anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural adjustments, and sensory and musculoskeletal components of postural control compared with children with typical development.
“To date, it is known that children with CP show deficits in anticipatory postural adjustments, 4 -9 and reactive postural adjustments, 10 -12 as well as sensory 4,13 and musculoskeletal components 14,15 of postural control, compared with children with typical development.”
From Exercise interventions improve postural control in children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review (2015) · cites this paper as [10]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 149
- Authors
- Burtner, P. A., Qualls, C., & Woollacott, M. H.
- Affiliations
- University of New Mexico (US)
- University of Oregon (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burtner, P.A
- Venue
- Gait & Posture
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 163-174
- ISSN
- 0966-6362 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971563542
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Gait & Posture (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oregon
- National Center for Research Resources
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Keywords
- spastic cerebral palsy, spastic diplegia, balance control, stance phase, muscle recruitment, antagonist muscle activation, muscle onset latency, perturbations, children, walking experience, postural control
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review