Global Progress in Abortion Advocacy and Policy: An Assessment of the Decade since ICPD
Abstract
The 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) Programme of Action represented a positive step toward legitimising abortion as a component of basic reproductive health services. This paper reviews how the ICPD principles and recommendations have been applied in the past decade toward increasing women's access to affordable, safe and legal abortion services. It examines advocacy efforts to increase understanding of abortion among policymakers and the public, policy and action at the global level, progress made in national-level policies and services, and obstacles encountered. Research and advocacy are helping to break the silence globally about unsafe abortion, and there is an emerging global movement supporting women's right to safe abortion. A great deal has been accomplished in the ten short years since ICPD, in spite of serious setbacks in some countries and continuing obstacles. A synthesis of public health and rights-based approaches, and strategic partnerships with other social justice movements are called for, as a foundation for effective legal reform efforts and to ensure that women have access to safe abortion services.RésuméLe Programme d'action de la Conférence internationale de 1994 sur la population et le développement (CIPD) représentait une avancée vers la légitimation de l'avortement comme élément des services de santé génésique de base. Cet article montre comment les principes et les recommandations de la CIPD ont été appliqués ces dix dernières années afin d'élargir l'accès des femmes à des services d'avortement abordables, sûrs et légaux. Il examine le plaidoyer pour relever la compréhension de l'avortement chez les décideurs et le public, les politiques et l'action au niveau mondial, les progrès accomplis dans les politiques et les services nationaux, et les obstacles rencontrés. La recherche et le plaidoyer aident à rompre le silence qui entoure les avortements à risque, et un mouvement mondial se fait jour pour soutenir le droit des femmes à un avortement sûr. Beaucoup a été fait depuis la CIPD, malgré de graves revers dans certains pays et les écueils persistants. Une synthèse des approches publiques fondées sur la santé et les droits, et des partenariats stratégiques avec d'autres mouvements de justice sociale sont nécessaires comme fondement d'une réforme légale efficace et pour garantir aux femmes l'accès à des services d'avortement sûr.ResumenEl Programa de Acción de la Conferencia Internacional sobre la Población y el Desarrollo (CIPD), celebrada en 1994, representó un paso positivo hacia la legitimación del aborto como un componente de los servicios esenciales de salud reproductiva. En este artículo se revisa cómo los principios y las recomendaciones de la CIPD se han aplicado en la ãltima década para aumentar el acceso de las mujeres a los servicios de aborto seguro y legal, a precios asequibles. Se examinan los esfuerzos de promoción y defensa para crear mayor conciencia del aborto entre los formuladores de políticas y el pãblico, las políticas y medidas mundiales, los avances logrados en las políticas y los servicios a nivel nacional, y los obstáculos encontrados. Las investigaciones y la promoción y defensa están ayudando a romper el silencio global en torno al aborto inseguro. Un movimiento mundial emergente apoya el derecho de las mujeres al aborto seguro. En los ãltimos diez años, se han logrado grandes avances, pese a continuos obstáculos y graves contratiempos en algunos países. A fin de cimentar esfuerzos eficaces de reforma judicial y de garantizar que las mujeres tengan acceso a servicios de aborto seguro, es necesario realizar una síntesis de los enfoques de salud pãblica y aquellos basados en los derechos, y formar alianzas estratégicas con otros movimientos de justicia social.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Advocacy strategies for safe abortion that seem to work are context specific, but often based on deep and well-informed understanding of abortion, a public health approach synthesized with human rights, and strategic involvement of multiple stakeholders.
“Advocacy strategies for safe abortion that seem to work are context specific, but often based on deep and well‐informed understanding of abortion, a public health approach synthesized with the articulation of human rights, and the strategic involvement of multiple stakeholders.16, 17, 18”
From Advocating safe abortion: outcomes of a multi‐country needs assessment on the potential role of national societies of obstetrics and gynecology (2020) · cites this paper as [17]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
de Vries, I., van Keizerswaard, L. J., Tolboom, B., Bulthuis, S., van der Kwaak, A., Tank, J., & de Koning, K. (2020) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1002/ijgo.13092 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hessini, L.
- Affiliations
- Ipas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hessini, Leila
- Venue
- Reproductive Health Matters
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 88-100
- ISSN
- 0968-8080 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-9576
- OpenAlex
- W2096458789
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reproductive Health Matters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
- Keywords
- abortion policy, ICPD Programme of Action, safe abortion access, abortion advocacy, unsafe abortion, women's reproductive rights, reproductive health services, abortion law reform, rights-based approach, public health approach, social justice movements, global health policy, abortion access
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Legal, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Patient Advocacy, Pregnancy, Internationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review