Cited by 58Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesElder Abuse and Neglect

Evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital

Open access
Bacchus, Loraine J, Bewley, Susan, Vitolas, Carlos Torres, Aston, Gillian, Jordan, Peter, Murray, Susan F·2010·Reproductive Health Matters

Abstract

This paper reports on an evaluation of a domestic violence intervention in the maternity and sexual health services of a UK hospital. The intervention encompassed guidelines, staff training, inclusion of routine enquiry for domestic violence with all patients, and referral of women disclosing violence to an on-site advocacy service. An “assumption querying” approach was applied to evaluate the intervention. Programmatic assumptions were identified and tested using interviews with service providers and patients, review of patient records, and pre- and post-training questionnaires. Domestic violence training resulted in changes in health professionals' knowledge and practice in the short-term, but universal routine enquiry was not achieved even in a context of organisational support, guidelines, training and advocacy. Potential and actual harm occurred, including breaches of confidentiality and failure to document evidence, limiting women's ability to access civil and legal remedies. Advocacy support led to positive outcomes for many women, as long as support to maintain positive changes, whether women stayed with or left the violent partner, continued to be given. Maternity and sexual health services were found to be opportune points of intervention for domestic violence services that combine routine enquiry by clinicians, support after disclosure and attention to harm reduction.RésuméCet article décrit l'évaluation d'une intervention en matière de violence domestique dans les services de santé génésique et de maternité d'un hôpital britannique. L'intervention comportait des directives, la formation du personnel, une enquête systématique auprès de toutes les patientes sur la violence domestique et l'aiguillage des femmes révélant des violences vers un service de sensibilisation sur place. L'intervention a été évaluée avec une approche de « questionnement des postulats ». On a identifié et testé les postulats des programmes par des entretiens avec les prestataires de services et les patientes, l'examen des dossiers des patientes et des questionnaires avant et après la formation. La formation sur la violence domestique a changé à court terme les connaissances et la pratique des professionnels de santé, mais n'a pas réussi à les inciter à questionner systématiquement toutes les patientes, même dans un contexte de soutien organisationnel, de directives, de formation et de sensibilisation. On a constaté des préjudices potentiels et réels, notamment des violations de la confidentialité et l'incapacité à réunir des preuves, limitant ainsi la possibilité des femmes d'avoir accès à des réparations civiles et juridiques. Le soutien à la sensibilisation a eu des résultats positifs pour beaucoup de femmes, tant que le soutien s'est poursuivi pour maintenir des changements positifs, que les femmes restent ou non avec le partenaire violent. Les services de santé génésique et de maternité se sont révélés des points précieux d'intervention pour les services de violence domestique car ils associent l'enquête systématique des cliniciens, le soutien après la révélation et l'attention à la réduction des risques.ResumenEste artículo resume la evaluación de una intervención relacionada con la violencia doméstica en los servicios de salud materna y sexual de un hospital del Reino Unido. La intervención comprendió guías, capacitación del personal, indagación rutinaria de todas las pacientes respecto a la violencia doméstica y referencia de las que denunciaron violencia a un servicio de promoción y defensa in situ. Se aplicó un enfoque de “investigación de suposiciones” para evaluar la intervención. Las suposiciones programáticas fueron identificadas y probadas utilizando entrevistas con profesionales de la salud y pacientes, revisión de los expedientes médicos y cuestionarios pre- y post-capacitación. La capacitación en violencia doméstica produjo cambios en los conocimientos y las prácticas de los profesionales de la salud a corto plazo, pero no se logró establecer una rutina de indagación universal, ni tan siquiera en un contexto con apoyo organizacional, guías, capacitación y promoción y defensa. Ocurrieron daños posibles y reales, como violación de confidencialidad e incumplimiento de documentar la evidencia; éste último limitó la capacidad de las mujeres para acceder remedios civiles y jurídicos. El apoyo de promoción y defensa llevó a resultados positivos para muchas mujeres, siempre y cuando se les continuara brindando apoyo para mantener cambios positivos, independientemente de que la mujer permaneciera con su pareja violenta o la dejara. Se concluyó que los servicios de salud materna y sexual son puntos oportunos de intervención para los servicios contra la violencia doméstica, que combinan la indagación rutinaria por parte del personal de salud, apoyo después de confirmada la violencia y atención a la reducción de daños.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0968-8080(10)36526-8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 58

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. LJ Bacchus et al / Reproductive Health Matters 2010;18(36):147-157
  2. Thompson RS, Rivara FP, Thompson DC, et al. Identification and management of domestic violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2000;19:253-63.

Authors
Bacchus, L. J., Bewley, S., Vitolas, C. T., Aston, G., Jordan, P., & Murray, S. F.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Reproductive Health Matters
Published
2010-01
Volume
18
Issue
36
Pages
147-157
ISSN
  • 0968-8080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9576
OpenAlex
W2113379161
Cited by
58
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Reproductive Health Matters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
Keywords
domestic violence, domestic violence intervention, obstetric care, sexual health services, employee training, advocacy services, breach of confidentiality, evidence documentation, harm reduction, disclosure of violence, hospital-based intervention
MeSH terms
Female, United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Public, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Maternal Health Services, Medical Audit, Surveys and Questionnaires, Domestic Violence, Reproductive Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review