Cited by 58Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and CessationMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

In vivo imaging of nicotinic receptor upregulation following chronic (−)-nicotine treatment in baboon using SPECT

Kassiou, Michael, Eberl, Stefan, Meikle, Steven R, Birrell, Alex, Constable, Chris, Fulham, Michael J, Wong, Dean F, Musachio, John L·2001·Nuclear Medicine and Biology

Abstract

To quantify changes in neuronal nAChR binding in vivo, quantitative dynamic SPECT studies were performed with 5-[(123)I]-iodo-A-85380 in baboons pre and post chronic treatment with (-)-nicotine or saline control. Infusion of (-)-nicotine at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg/24h for 14 days resulted in plasma (-)-nicotine levels of 27.3 ng/mL. This is equivalent to that found in an average human smoker (20 cigarettes a day). In the baboon brain the regional distribution of 5-[(123)I]-iodo-A-85380 was consistent with the known densities of nAChRs (thalamus > frontal cortex > cerebellum). Changes in nAChR binding were estimated from the volume of distribution (V(d) ) and binding potential (BP) derived from 3-compartment model fits. In the (-)-nicotine treated animal V(d) was significantly increased in the thalamus (52%) and cerebellum (50%) seven days post cessation of (-)-nicotine treatment, suggesting upregulation of nAChRs. The observed 33% increase in the frontal cortex failed to reach significance. A significant increase in BP was seen in the thalamus. In the saline control animal no changes were observed in V(d) or BP under any experimental conditions. In this preliminary study, we have demonstrated for the first time in vivo upregulation of neuronal nAChR binding following chronic (-)-nicotine treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0969-8051(00)00206-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 58

Authors
Kassiou, M., Eberl, S., Meikle, S. R., Birrell, A., Constable, C., Fulham, M. J., Wong, D. F., & Musachio, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Kassiou, Michael
Venue
Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
165-175
ISSN
0969-8051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996023182
Cited by
58
References
42
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nuclear Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r29ca077349-01)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA77349)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor up-regulation, chronic nicotine treatment, baboons, SPECT imaging, binding potential, volume of distribution, thalamus, cerebellum, frontal cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Azetidines, Brain, Cerebellum, Frontal Lobe, Iodine Radioisotopes, Kinetics, Male, Nicotine, Papio, Pyridines, Radioligand Assay, Receptors, Nicotinic, Thalamus, Up-Regulation, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review