In vivo imaging of nicotinic receptor upregulation following chronic (−)-nicotine treatment in baboon using SPECT
Abstract
To quantify changes in neuronal nAChR binding in vivo, quantitative dynamic SPECT studies were performed with 5-[(123)I]-iodo-A-85380 in baboons pre and post chronic treatment with (-)-nicotine or saline control. Infusion of (-)-nicotine at a dose of 2.0 mg/kg/24h for 14 days resulted in plasma (-)-nicotine levels of 27.3 ng/mL. This is equivalent to that found in an average human smoker (20 cigarettes a day). In the baboon brain the regional distribution of 5-[(123)I]-iodo-A-85380 was consistent with the known densities of nAChRs (thalamus > frontal cortex > cerebellum). Changes in nAChR binding were estimated from the volume of distribution (V(d) ) and binding potential (BP) derived from 3-compartment model fits. In the (-)-nicotine treated animal V(d) was significantly increased in the thalamus (52%) and cerebellum (50%) seven days post cessation of (-)-nicotine treatment, suggesting upregulation of nAChRs. The observed 33% increase in the frontal cortex failed to reach significance. A significant increase in BP was seen in the thalamus. In the saline control animal no changes were observed in V(d) or BP under any experimental conditions. In this preliminary study, we have demonstrated for the first time in vivo upregulation of neuronal nAChR binding following chronic (-)-nicotine treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased nAChRs are seen with in vivo imaging in baboon brain after chronic nicotine and in the brains of current smokers.
“Increased nAChRs are also seen with in vivo imaging techniques in baboon brain after chronic administration of nicotine (Kassiou et al., 2001) and the brains of current smokers (Staley et al., 2006;Wu ¨llner et al., 2008).”
From Chronic Sazetidine-A at Behaviorally Active Doses Does Not Increase Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors in Rodent Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Kassiou et al., 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Kassiou, M., Eberl, S., Meikle, S. R., Birrell, A., Constable, C., Fulham, M. J., Wong, D. F., & Musachio, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kassiou, Michael
- Venue
- Nuclear Medicine and Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-175
- ISSN
- 0969-8051 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996023182
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r29ca077349-01)
- National Cancer Institute (CA77349)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, receptor up-regulation, chronic nicotine treatment, baboons, SPECT imaging, binding potential, volume of distribution, thalamus, cerebellum, frontal cortex
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Azetidines, Brain, Cerebellum, Frontal Lobe, Iodine Radioisotopes, Kinetics, Male, Nicotine, Papio, Pyridines, Radioligand Assay, Receptors, Nicotinic, Thalamus, Up-Regulation, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Radiopharmaceuticals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review