Cited by 221Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesAgricultural and Food SciencesEnergy and Environment Impacts

Wood briquette torrefaction

Felfli, Felix Fonseca, Luengo, Carlos Alberto, Suárez, Jose Antonio, Beatón, Pedro Anibal·2005·Energy for Sustainable Development

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0973-0826(08)60519-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one case, solid yield decreased from 94% to 56% when torrefaction temperature increased from 220 °C to 275 °C.

    “For instance, in one case the solid yield decreased from 94% to 56% when the torrefaction temperature increased from 220 °C to 275 °C (Felfli et al., 2005).”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Felfli et al., 2005

  • The carbon content of a palm kernel shell increased from 55% to 58% at a torrefaction temperature of 250 °C when residence time increased from 30 to 90 minutes.

    “For example, the carbon content of a palm kernel shell increased from 55% to 58% at a torrefaction temperature of 250 °C, when the residence time was increased from 30 to 90 minutes (Felfli et al., 2005).”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Felfli et al., 2005

  • The solid product yield of torrefaction varies widely from 50% to 97% depending on temperature and residence time.

    “The fraction of solid product yields varies widely from 50% to 97% (Felfli et al., 2005) depending on the temperature and residence time.”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Felfli et al., 2005

  • At the same condition, the oxygen content of the product decreased from 31% to 29%.

    “At the same condition, the oxygen content of the product was decreased from 31% to 29%.”

    From A Comprehensive Review on Biomass Torrefaction (2014) · cites this paper as Felfli et al., 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Felfli, F. F., Luengo, C. A., Suárez, J. A., & Beatón, P. A.
Affiliations
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
Corresponding author
Felfli, Felix Fonseca
Venue
Energy for Sustainable Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
19-22
ISSN
0973-0826 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053727082
Cited by
221
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Energy Sustainable Development/Energy for sustainable development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Energy and Environment Impacts
Keywords
torrefaction, wood briquettes, energy yield, calorific value, equilibrium moisture content, hydrophobicity, moisture absorption, proximate analysis, elemental analysis, temperature effects, residence time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review