Factors affecting the direct mineralization of CO2 with olivine
Abstract
Olivine, one of the most abundant minerals existing in nature, is explored as a CO2 carbonation agent for direct carbonation of CO2 in flue gas. Olivine based CO2 capture is thermodynamically favorable and can form a stable carbonate for long-term storage. Experimental results have shown that water vapor plays an important role in improving CO2 carbonation rate and capacities. Other operation conditions including reaction temperature, initial CO2 concentration, residence time corresponding to the flow rate of CO2 gas stream, and water vapor concentration also considerably affect the performance of the technology.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A higher capacity of 18% was achieved capturing flue gas with 15% CO2 in the presence of 8.3% water at 150 1C.
“A higher capacity of 18% was achieved capturing flue gas with 15% CO 2 in the presence of 8.3% water at 150 1C.”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [75]
When using 5 g of olivine (surface of 2.5 m2 g−1) at temperature ranging from 100 to 500 1C and flue composition of 10% CO2, 8.3% H2O (balanced with N2), the storage capacity was 0.12 g CO2 per g olivine (12%) after 30 minutes.
“They reported that when using 5 g of olivine (surface of 2.5 m 2 g À1 ) at temperature ranging from 100 to 500 1C and flue composition of 10% CO 2 , 8.3% H 2 O (balanced with N 2 ), the storage capacity was 0.12 g CO 2 per g olivine (12%) after 30 minutes. 75”
From A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub> (2014) · cites this paper as [75]
Cites
CO2 disposal by means of silicates
SEIFRITZ, W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345486b0 · Cited by 956 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO <sub>2</sub>
Sanna, A., Uibu, M., Caramanna, G., Kuusik, R., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00035h · Cited by 1,194 · see citing works
Mineralization of carbon dioxide: A literature review
Romanov, V., Soong, Y., Carney, C., Rush, G. E., Nielsen, B., & O'Connor, W. (2015) · ChemBioEng Reviews · doi:10.1002/cben.201500002 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kwon, S., Fan, M., DaCosta, H. F. M., & Russell, A. G.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Wyoming (US)
- Caterpillar (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fan, Maohong
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1233-1239
- ISSN
- 1001-0742 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2079480202
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Wyoming
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
- Keywords
- olivine, CO2 mineralization, direct carbonation, flue gas, CO2 capture, water vapor effect, reaction temperature, residence time, CO2 concentration
- MeSH terms
- Carbon Dioxide, Carbonates, Magnesium Compounds, Silicates, Iron Compounds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
