Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review

GOSWAMI, Madhurankhi, DEKA, Suresh·2020·Pedosphere

Abstract

Abstract With the continuous increase in human population, there is widespread usage of chemical fertilizers that are responsible for introducing abiotic stresses in agricultural crop lands. Abiotic stresses are major constraints for crop yield and global food security and therefore require an immediate response. The implementation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) into the agricultural production system can be a profitable alternative because of its efficiency in plant growth regulation and abiotic stress management. These bacteria have the potential to promote plant growth and to aid in the management of plant diseases and abiotic stresses in the soil through production of bacterial phytohormones and associated metabolites as well as through significant root morphological changes. These changes result in improved plant-water relations and nutritional status in plants and stimulate plants' defensive mechanisms to overcome unfavorable environmental conditions. Here, we describe the significance of plant-microbe interactions, highlighting the role of PGPR, bacterial phytohormones, and bacterial metabolites in relieving abiotic environmental stress in soil. Further research is necessary to gather in-depth knowledge on PGPR-associated mechanisms and plant-microbe interactions in order to pave a way for field-scale application of beneficial rhizobacteria, with the aim of building a healthy and sustainable agricultural system. Therefore, this review aims to emphasize the role of PGPR in growth promotion and management of abiotic soil stress with the goal of developing an eco-friendly and cost-effective strategy for future agricultural sustainability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1002-0160(19)60839-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
GOSWAMI, M., & DEKA, S.
Venue
Pedosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
40-61
ISSN
1002-0160 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996285874
Cited by
276
References
2
FWCI
20.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1002-0160(19)60839-8
The paper
GOSWAMI, M., & DEKA, S. (2020). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review. Pedosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(19)60839-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.