The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review
Abstract
Abstract With the continuous increase in human population, there is widespread usage of chemical fertilizers that are responsible for introducing abiotic stresses in agricultural crop lands. Abiotic stresses are major constraints for crop yield and global food security and therefore require an immediate response. The implementation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) into the agricultural production system can be a profitable alternative because of its efficiency in plant growth regulation and abiotic stress management. These bacteria have the potential to promote plant growth and to aid in the management of plant diseases and abiotic stresses in the soil through production of bacterial phytohormones and associated metabolites as well as through significant root morphological changes. These changes result in improved plant-water relations and nutritional status in plants and stimulate plants' defensive mechanisms to overcome unfavorable environmental conditions. Here, we describe the significance of plant-microbe interactions, highlighting the role of PGPR, bacterial phytohormones, and bacterial metabolites in relieving abiotic environmental stress in soil. Further research is necessary to gather in-depth knowledge on PGPR-associated mechanisms and plant-microbe interactions in order to pave a way for field-scale application of beneficial rhizobacteria, with the aim of building a healthy and sustainable agricultural system. Therefore, this review aims to emphasize the role of PGPR in growth promotion and management of abiotic soil stress with the goal of developing an eco-friendly and cost-effective strategy for future agricultural sustainability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress
Yang, J., Kloepper, J. W., & Ryu, C.-M. (2009) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004 · Cited by 1,852
Cytokinin producing bacteria enhance plant growth in drying soil
Arkhipova, T. N., Prinsen, E., Veselov, S. U., Martinenko, E. V., Melentiev, A. I., & Kudoyarova, G. R. (2007) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9233-5 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Soil microbial inoculants for sustainable agriculture: Limitations and opportunities
O'Callaghan, M., Ballard, R. A., & Wright, D. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12811 · Cited by 489
The Impact of Drought Stress on Soil Microbial Community, Enzyme Activities and Plants
Bogati, K., & Walczak, M. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12010189 · Cited by 391
Plant Growth Stimulation by Microbial Consortia
Santoyo, G., Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Parra-Cota, F. I., Santos-Villalobos, S. D. L., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., & Glick, B. R. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11020219 · Cited by 363
Khatoon, Z., Huang, S., Rafique, M., Fakhar, A., Kamran, M. A., & Santoyo, G. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111118 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- GOSWAMI, M., & DEKA, S.
- Venue
- Pedosphere
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-61
- ISSN
- 1002-0160 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996285874
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1002-0160(19)60839-8
- The paper
- GOSWAMI, M., & DEKA, S. (2020). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria—alleviators of abiotic stresses in soil: A review. Pedosphere. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1002-0160(19)60839-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.