The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) when applied in a North American cardiac surgical population. METHODS: The simple additive EuroSCORE model was applied to predict operative mortality (in-hospital or 30-day) in 401684 patients undergoing coronary or valve surgery in 1998 and 1999 as well as in 188913 patients undergoing surgery in 1995 in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. RESULTS: The proportion of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was greater in STS patients (84%) than in Europe (65%). STS patients were also older (mean age 65.3 versus 62.5), and had more diabetes (30 versus 17%) and prior cardiac surgery (11 versus 7%). Other comorbidity was also significantly more prevalent in STS patients. EuroSCORE predicted overall mortality was virtually identical to the observed mortality (1998/1999: predicted 3.994%, observed 3.992%; 1995: observed and predicted 4.156%). Predicted mortality also closely matched observed mortality across the risk groups. Discrimination was good to very good for the population overall and for isolated CABG in both time periods, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve between 0.75 and 0.78. CONCLUSION: Despite substantial demographic differences between Europe and North America, EuroSCORE performs very well in the STS database, and can be recommended as a simple, additive risk stratification system on both sides of the Atlantic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Validation, updating and impact of clinical prediction rules: A review
Toll, D. B., Janssen, K. J. M., Vergouwe, Y., & Moons, K. G. M. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.008 · Cited by 580
Transapical Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Humans: Initial Clinical Experience
Lichtenstein, S. V., Cheung, A., Ye, J., Thompson, C. R., Carere, R. G., Pasupati, S., & Webb, J. G. (2006) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.106.632927 · Cited by 561
Dewey, T. M., Brown, D., Ryan, W. H., Herbert, M. A., Prince, S. L., & Mack, M. J. (2008) · The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.011 · Cited by 405
Hickey, G. L., Grant, S. W., Murphy, G. J., Bhabra, M., Pagano, D., McAllister, K., Buchan, I., & Bridgewater, B. (2013) · European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezs584 · Cited by 154
Agrifoglio, M., Trezzi, M., Barili, F., Dainese, L., Cheema, F. H., Topkara, V. K., Ghislandi, C., Parolari, A., Polvani, G., Alamanni, F., et al. (2008) · Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery · doi:10.1186/1749-8090-3-35 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Nashef, S.
- Venue
- European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-105
- ISSN
- 1010-7940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108349586
- Cited by
- 546
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00208-7
- The paper
- Nashef, S. (2002). Validation of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) in North American cardiac surgery. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00208-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.