Selective distribution of porphyrins in skin thick basal cell carcinoma after topical application of methyl 5-aminolevulinate
Abstract
Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) of superficial basal cell carcinoma (BCC) with 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) has achieved promising clinical results. However, the efficacy of this therapy for thick BCC is dramatically decreased by a limited diffusion of hydrophilic ALA into the tumor. Lipophilic esters of ALA may enhance their penetration into the lesion. In this randomized, open clinical study, microscopic fluorescence photometry incorporating a light-sensitive thermo-electrically cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) camera was employed to investigate the penetration of methyl 5-aminolevulinate-induced porphyrin fluorescence in thick BCC lesions. Both the distribution pattern and the amount of porphyrins in 32 lesions of 16 patients were studied after topical application of 16, 80 or 160 mg/g of methyl 5-aminolevulinate for 3 or 18 h. A highly selective and homogeneous distribution of methyl 5-aminolevulinate-induced porphyrin fluorescence was seen in all lesions studied, with much less fluorescence in the adjacent normal skin tissues. In lesions of up to 2 mm thickness the application of 160 mg/g methyl 5-aminolevulinate for 3 h showed the highest ratio of porphyrin fluorescence depth to tumor depth (0.98+/-0.04), thus providing a biologic rationale for a clinical PDT trial with this regimen.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Application of 160 mg/g MAL for 3 h provided the highest ratio of PpIX fluorescence depth to tumor depth.
“This study also evaluated the effects of MAL dose and incubation time on the intensity and depth of PpIX fluorescence and concluded that the application of 160 mg/g MAL for 3 h provided the highest ratio of PpIX fluorescence depth to tumor depth.”
From 5-Aminolevulinic Acid as a Theranostic Agent for Tumor Fluorescence Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
MAL induces selective PpIX accumulation in thick human BCC lesions following topical application.
“MAL also induces selective PpIX accumulation in thick human BCC lesions following topical application [20].”
From 5-Aminolevulinic Acid as a Theranostic Agent for Tumor Fluorescence Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 25 · Cited by 218
- Authors
- Peng, Q., Soler, A. M., Warloe, T., Nesland, J. M., & Giercksky, K.-E.
- Affiliations
- University of Oslo (NO)
- Corresponding author
- Peng, Qian
- Venue
- Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 140-145
- ISSN
- 1011-1344 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031477667
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
- Keywords
- topical photodynamic therapy, basal cell carcinoma, porphyrin fluorescence, topical drug penetration, tumor thickness, superficial basal cell carcinoma
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Topical, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aminolevulinic Acid, Analysis of Variance, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Porphyrins, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Photosensitizing Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review