The HERITAGE Family Study: Quality assurance and quality control.
Abstract
The HERITAGE (HEalth, RIsk factors, exercise Training And GEnetics) Family Study is the first multicenter family clinical trial of its kind. Conducted by a consortium of five universities in the United States and Canada, the study has as its primary goal to document the role of the genotype in the cardiovascular, metabolic, and hormonal responses to aerobic exercise training. A comprehensive protocol was implemented at four Clinical Centers (CC) for the generation of data on sedentary subjects. This group included 450 caucasians from 90 nuclear families (father, mother, three children) and 200 black subjects from 40 to 100 family units over a 5-year period. The entire family was tested before and after a 20-week exercise training program. The fifth participating center, the Data Coordinating Center (DCC), is responsible for data management and data analysis. A Consortium Coordinating Center (CCC) responsible for the overall coordination and direction of the study was established at the Quebec CC. Quality assurance and quality control are jointly coordinated by the CCC and the DCC. A multicenter study of this magnitude requires careful standardization of all procedures and constant monitoring of quality control at all levels of operation. This report describes the quality assurance and quality control measures implemented in the HERITAGE Family Study, including some examples with real data.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The technical error (TE) for the risk factors was quantified from repeated measurements in 60 subjects over 3 weeks.
“Sixty subjects were measured three times over a period of three weeks, and variation in resting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and in fasting plasma HDL-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), and insulin (FI) was quantified.”
From Adverse metabolic response to regular exercise: is it a rare or common occurrence? (2012) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 52
- Authors
- Gagnon, J.
- Affiliations
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Gagnon, J
- ORCID
- Gagnon, J
- Venue
- Annals of Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 520-529
- ISSN
- 1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2031807525
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL 45670, HL47323, R01HL047317, R01HL047323, HL47317, R01HL045670)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Physical Performance
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- HERITAGE Family Study, quality assurance, quality control, aerobic exercise training, genotypes, cardiovascular response to exercise, exercise metabolism, hormonal response to exercise, sedentary subjects, data management, standardization of procedures, nuclear family
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cardiovascular Diseases, Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Trials as Topic, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Family, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Quality Control, Research Design, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Exercise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review