Cited by 31Transplantation: Methods and OutcomesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Increased morbidity and high variability of cyclosporine levels in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Flippin, Mindee S., Canter, Charles E., Balzer, David T.·2000·The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Abstract

Objectives This study analyzed the relationship of variability in routine trough cyclosporine (CSA) levels to morbidity after pediatric cardiac transplantation. Background Due to high interindividual variation between dosage and blood concentrations, trough surveillance CSA levels are routinely performed after cardiac transplantation to adjust dosages. In addition, trough CSA levels have been used as a measure of patient compliance in transplant recipients. Recent investigations have demonstrated a relationship between late rejection and mistimed CSA dosing intervals, which could also lead to CSA levels that are incorrectly presumed to be trough levels. Methods Trough surveillance whole-blood CSA levels were retrospectively reviewed in 49 pediatric heart transplant recipients who had a median follow-up of 42 months (range 6 to 138 months). All patients received the same immunosuppression regimen (CSA, azathioprine, and steroids), the same CSA-level surveillance protocol, and the same stabilization of CSA dose and level in the therapeutic range (150 to 300 ng/ml) prior to hospital discharge. CSA levels drawn because of coexisting phenomena (drug interaction, gastroenteritis) that could cause CSA-level fluctuation were excluded from analysis. Cyclosporine variability was measured as the percentage of CSA levels that were considered sub-therapeutic (< or = 100 ng/ml), toxic (> or = 450 ng/ml), or both. Cyclosporine-level variability was then analyzed in respect to demographic and outcome variables. Results For the group, the median percentage of sub-therapeutic levels was 3% (range, 0% to 16%); the median percentage of toxic levels was 5% (range, 0% to 36%); the median of the combination of sub-therapeutic and toxic levels was 10% (0% to 38%). Eight of the 49 patients (16%) has a high (>20%) percentage of sub-therapeutic + toxic levels or high CSA variability. High CSA variability was significantly associated with recipients > 12 months of age (p = 0.028), and recipients with a history of non-compliance (p < 0.001). Patients with high CSA variability had a significantly higher median number of hospitalized days per year of follow-up (p = 0.036), higher rate of recurrent rejection (> or = 2 episodes; p = 0.0003), and higher death rate more than 6 months after transplant (p = 0.01). Conclusions Although this study could not determine cause, high variability in trough CSA levels was a marker for pediatric heart transplant recipients at greater risk for recurrent rejection and hospitalization after transplantation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1053-2498(00)00061-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Kahan, 1985, Individualization of cyclosporine therapy using pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, Transplantation, 40, 457, 10.1097/00007890-198511000-00001 · DOI
  2. Valantine, 1990, Long-term management and results in heart transplant recipients, Cardiol Clin, 8, 141, 10.1016/S0733-8651(18)30389-8 · DOI
  3. Shaw, 1989, Advances in cyclosporine pharmacology, measurement, and therapeutic monitoring, Clin Chem, 35, 1299, 10.1093/clinchem/35.7.1299 · DOI
  4. Kahan, 1987, Immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine for cardiac transplantation, Circulation, 75, 40, 10.1161/01.CIR.75.1.40 · DOI
  5. Cooney, 1997, Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in paediatric transplant recipients, Clin Pharmacokinet, 32, 481, 10.2165/00003088-199732060-00004 · DOI
  6. Grevel, 1991, Abbreviated kinetic profiles in area-under-the-curve monitoring of cyclosporine therapy, Clin Chem, 37, 1905, 10.1093/clinchem/37.11.1905 · DOI
  7. Regazzi, 1992, Optimization of sampling time for cyclosporine monitoring in transplant patients, J Clin Pharmacol, 32, 978, 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03798.x · DOI
  8. White, 1997, Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine Sandimmune versus the microemulsion Neoral in heart transplant recipients, J Heart Lung Transplant, 16, 787
  9. Didlake, 1988, Patient noncompliance, Transplant Proc, 20, 63
  10. De Geest, 1998, Late acute rejection and subclinical noncompliance with cyclosporine therapy in heart transplant recipients, J Heart Lung Transplant, 17, 854
  11. Canter, 1994, Steroid withdrawal in the pediatric heart transplant recipient initially treated with triple immunosuppression, J Heart Lung Transplant, 13, 74
  12. Wolf, 1989, Measurement of cyclosporine concentrations in whole blood, Clin Chem, 35, 120, 10.1093/clinchem/35.1.120 · DOI
  13. Almond, 1993, Risk factors for chronic rejection in renal allograft recipients, Transplantation, 55, 752, 10.1097/00007890-199304000-00013 · DOI
  14. Burke, 1994, Long-term efficacy and safety of cyclosporine in renal transplant recipients, N Engl J Med, 331, 358, 10.1056/NEJM199408113310604 · DOI
  15. Valantine H, Hunt S, Gamberg P, Miller J, Luikart H. Impact of cyclosporine dose on long-term outcome after heart transplantation. Transplantation Proc 994;26:2710–2.
  16. Grattan, 1990, Eight-year results of cyclosporine-treated patients with cardiac transplantation, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 99, 500, 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)36981-8 · DOI
  17. Olivari, 1990, Five-year experience with triple-drug immunosuppressive therapy in cardiac transplantation, Circulation, 82, IV276, IV80
  18. Keogh, 1995, Ketoconazole to reduce the need for cyclosporine after cardiac transplantation, N Engl J Med, 333, 628, 10.1056/NEJM199509073331004 · DOI
  19. Lindholm, 1992, Demographic factors influencing cyclosporine pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with uremia, Clin Pharmacol Ther, 52, 359, 10.1038/clpt.1992.156 · DOI
  20. Schweizer, 1990, Noncompliance in organ transplant recipients, Transplantation, 49, 374, 10.1097/00007890-199002000-00029 · DOI
  21. Kiley, 1993, A study of treatment compliance following kidney transplantation, Transplantation, 55, 51, 10.1097/00007890-199301000-00010 · DOI
  22. Hmiel, 1997, Conversion from Sandimmune to Neoral cyclosporine formulations in pediatric solid-organ recipients, J Heart Lung Transplant, 16, 77
  23. Cramer, 1989, How often is medication taken as prescribed? A novel assessment technique, JAMA, 261, 3273, 10.1001/jama.261.22.3273 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Flippin, M. S., Canter, C. E., & Balzer, D. T.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
343-349
ISSN
1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121898220
Cited by
31
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Keywords
cyclosporine, pediatric heart transplantation, trough concentration, immunosuppression, drug toxicity, patient noncompliance, recurrent rejection, post-transplant morbidity, mortality, immunosuppression dosing, drug monitoring, age at transplantation, drug interactions, gastroenteritis, azathioprine
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Graft Survival, Humans, Infant, Male, Morbidity, Probability, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Biomarkers, Incidence, Survival Rate, Heart Transplantation, Cyclosporine, Age Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review