Cited by 108Transplantation: Methods and OutcomesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and TreatmentsOrgan and Tissue Transplantation Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine after lung transplantation: a prospective, open, randomized two-center trial comparing two different immunosuppressive protocols

Treede, Hendrik, Klepetko, Walter, Reichenspurner, Hermann, Zuckermann, Andreas, Meiser, Bruno, Birsan, Tudor, Wisser, Wilfried, Reichert, Bruno·2001·The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Abstract

Background The need for better immunosuppressive protocols after lung transplantation led us to investigate tacrolimus (Tac) in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids or cyclosporine (CsA) in combination with MMF and steroids in a prospective, open, randomized trial after lung transplantation. Methods Between September 1997 and April 1999, 50 lung transplant recipients were randomized to receive either Tac (n = 26) or CsA (n = 24) in combination with MMF and steroids. All patients underwent induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for 3 days. Freedom from acute rejection (AR), patient survival, infection episodes, and side effects were monitored. Results There was no difference in patient demographics between the two groups. Six-month and 1-year survival was similar (84.6% and 73.1% in the Tac group vs 83.3% and 79.2% in the CsA group). Freedom from AR at 6 months and 1 year after lung transplantation was slightly higher in the Tac group (57.7% and 50% vs 45.8% and 33.3%, p = not significant [n.s.]), whereas the number of treated rejection episodes per 100 patient days in the Tac group was significantly lower (0.225 vs 0.426, p < .05). Four patients in the CsA group had to be switched to Tac. Two patients in the CsA group had to be retransplanted. Incidence of infections was similar in both groups with a trend toward more fungal infections in the Tac group (n = 7 vs n = 1, p = n.s.). Conclusions The combination of Tac and MMF seems to have slightly higher immunosuppressive potential compared with CsA and MMF. The effectiveness of Tac as a rescue agent is not paralleled with undue signs of overimmunosuppression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1053-2498(01)00244-3

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Keenan, 1998, Long term follow up clinical trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin for lung transplantation, J Heart Lung Transplant, 17, 58
  2. Costanzo MR, on behalf of the Mycophenolate Mofetil Cooperative Study Investigators. Results of the randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil vs azathioprine in heart transplantation. Proceedings from the 16th annual meeting of the American Society of Transplant Physicians. Abstract 9. 1997:87.
  3. Knoop, 1994, FK506 rescue therapy for irreversible airway rejection in heart–lung transplant recipients, Transplant Proc, 26, 3240
  4. Golling M, Lehmann T, Senninger N, et al. Tacrolimus reduction improves glucose metabolism and insulin secretion following liver transplantation. Presented at second international conference on New Trends in Clinical and Experimental Immunosuppression, Geneva, Switzerland. Abstract. 1996:68.
  5. Mühlbacher, 1996, 12-month results of the European tacrolimus kidney study, Adv Immunosuppression, 4, 2
  6. Meiser, 1999, Combination therapy with macrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil following cardiac transplantation, J Heart Lung Transplant, 18, 143, 10.1016/S1053-2498(98)00002-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Treede, H., Klepetko, W., Reichenspurner, H., Zuckermann, A., Meiser, B., Birsan, T., Wisser, W., & Reichert, B.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Reichenspurner, Hermann
Venue
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
511-517
ISSN
1053-2498 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970749259
Cited by
108
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
Keywords
tacrolimus, cyclosporine, lung transplantation, immunosuppressive therapy, mycophenolate mofetil, acute rejection, patient survival, infection incidence, fungal infection, induction therapy, antithymocyte globulin
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Bronchiolitis Obliterans, Chronic Disease, Creatinine, Drug Combinations, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Infections, Male, Middle Aged, Mycophenolic Acid, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Incidence, Survival Rate, Lung Transplantation, Tacrolimus, Cyclosporine, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review