Cited by 228Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

From diffusion tractography to quantitative white matter tract measures: a reproducibility study

Ciccarelli, O., Parker, G.J.M., Toosy, A.T., Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A.M., Barker, G.J., Boulby, P.A., Miller, D.H., Thompson, A.J.·2003·NeuroImage

Abstract

The aim of this study is to propose methods for assessing the reproducibility of diffusion tractography algorithms in future clinical studies and to show their application to the tractography algorithm developed in our unit, fast marching tractography (FMT). FMT estimates anatomical connectivity between brain regions using the information provided by diffusion tensor imaging. Three major white-matter pathways were investigated in 11 normal subjects--anterior callosal fibers, optic radiations, and pyramidal tracts. FMT was used to generate maps of connectivity metric, and regions of voxels with highest connectivity metric to an anatomically defined starting point were identified for each tract under investigation. The reproducibilities of tract-"normalized" volume (NV) and fractional anisotropy (FA) measurements were assessed over such regions. The values of tract volumes are consistent with the postmortem data. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for FA and NV ranged from 1.7 to 7.1% and from 2.2 to 18.6%, respectively. CVs were lowest in the anterior callosal fibers (range: 1.7- 7.8%), followed by the optic radiations (range: 1.2-18.6%) and pyramidal tracts (range: 2.6-15.5%), suggesting that fiber organization plays a role in determining the level of FMT reproducibility. In conclusion, these findings underline the importance of assessing the reliability of diffusion tractography before investigating white matter pathology.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00042-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sampling of microstructural measures along fiber pathways can be done by generating a binary mask of voxels through which streamlines pass and sampling within this mask, or by sampling at each point of the streamlines from a pre-calculated microstructure image.

    “This sampling may be done by first generating a binary mask that defines the voxels through which streamlines pass and then sampling from an underlying microstructure image within this mask (Ciccarelli et al., 2003; Heiervang et al., 2006; Kunimatsu et al., 2004; Voineskos et al., 2010). The sampling may alternatively be done by sampling microstructural measures at each point of the streamlines”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 228

Authors
Ciccarelli, O., Parker, G. J. M., Toosy, A. T., Wheeler-Kingshott, C. A. M., Barker, G. J., Boulby, P. A., Miller, D. H., & Thompson, A. J.
Affiliations
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Epilepsy Society (GB)
Corresponding author
Thompson, A.J.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-02
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
348-359
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041545311
Cited by
228
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
17.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Teva Pharmaceutical Industries
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
diffusion tractography, reproducibility, white matter tracts, fractional anisotropy, tract volume, anterior commissure, optic radiation, corticospinal tract, diffusion tensor imaging, structural connectivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Corpus Callosum, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Neural Pathways, Pyramidal Tracts, Visual Pathways, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Anisotropy, Echo-Planar Imaging, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review