Frequency effects of Chinese character processing in the brain: an event-related fMRI study
Abstract
Knowing how the brain processes Chinese characters of different frequencies of occurrence may shed light on the extent to which orthographic variations of different languages can influence reading processes in the brain. In the present study, event-related fMRI was used to investigate frequency effects on Chinese character processing. Reading low-frequency characters invoked higher activation in several brain regions including the left premotor/inferior frontal gyrus, supplementary motor area, left anterior insula, left posterior inferior temporal gyrus, left superior parietal cortex, and lingual cortex, while reading high-frequency characters resulted in higher activation in the left supramarginal/angular gyrus and left precuneus. The activation pattern of reading infrequently encountered characters reflects a more demanding processing procedure of retrieving, formulating, and coordinating the phonological output. Access to the lexical route may benefit the reading of high-frequency characters. By uncovering the differential brain responses in reading Chinese characters of different occurrence frequencies, not only has a substantial overlap between functional neuroanatomy of reading Chinese and alphabetical languages been demonstrated, but also features permitting the separation of language-specific content from universal mechanisms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Left occipitotemporal activation was less for words with high relative to low lexical frequency.
“However, this perspective did not explain why left occipitotemporal activation was less for (a) words with high relative to low lexical frequency (Kuo et al., 2003; Kronbichler et al., 2004)”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Kuo et al., 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 101 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Kuo, W.-J., Yeh, T.-C., Lee, C.-Y., Wu, Y. U.-T. E., Chou, C.-C., Ho, L.-T., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hsieh, J.-C.
- Affiliations
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- National Yang Ming University (TW)
- Corresponding author
- Hsieh, Jen-Chuen
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 720-730
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074341054
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 101
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 14.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Council (902314B075124,902314B075115, 902511S010001)
- Ministry of Education (89BFA221401, 89BFA221406)
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital (90400, 90443, 91361, 91380)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- Chinese character processing, character frequencies, reading, orthographic variation, lexical route, supplementary motor area, angular gyrus, anterior insula, inferior temporal gyrus
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Dominance, Cerebral, Female, Humans, Language, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reading, Regional Blood Flow, Semantics, Taiwan, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review