Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback
Abstract
It is commonly agreed that a functional dissociation with respect to the internal vs external control of movements exists for several brain regions. This has, however, only been tested in relation to the timing and preparation of motor responses, but not to ongoing movement control. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), the present study addressed the neuroanatomical substrate of the internal-external control hypothesis by comparing regional brain activation for cyclical bimanual movements performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Subjects performed a bimanual movement pattern, either with the help of on-line visual feedback of the movements (externally guided coordination) or with the eyes closed on the basis of an internal representation of the movement pattern (internally generated coordination). Visual control and baseline rest conditions were also added. Results showed a clear functional dissociation within the network involved in movement coordination. The hMT/V5+, the superior parietal cortex, the premotor cortex, the thalamus, and cerebellar lobule VI showed higher activation levels when movements were guided by visual feedback. Conversely, the basal ganglia, the supplementary motor area, cingulate motor cortex, the inferior parietal, frontal operculum, and cerebellar lobule IV-V/dentate nucleus showed higher involvement when movements were internally generated. Consequently, the present findings suggest the existence of distinct…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuroimaging studies have shown that internally cued and externally cued movements are associated with different cortical activation patterns.
“This hypothesis is supported by neuroimaging studies that have shown that internally cued and externally cued movements are associated with different cortical activation patterns (Debaere et al., 2003; Gerloff et al., 1998; Halsband et al., 1994).”
From Respiratory Responses to Two Voice Interventions for Parkinson's Disease (2022) · cites this paper as Debaere et al., 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 89 · Cited by 305
- Authors
- Debaere, F., Wenderoth, N., Sunaert, S., Van Hecke, P., & Swinnen, S. P.
- Affiliations
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Swinnen, Stephan P
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 764-776
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968878051
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 5.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (G.0105.00)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- bimanual coordination, augmented visual feedback, motor control, hMT+/V5, superior parietal cortex, premotor cortex, thalamus, cerebellar lobule VI, basal ganglia, supplementary motor area, inferior parietal cortex, frontal operculum, cerebellar dentate nucleus, cortico-cortical pathways
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Biofeedback, Psychology, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Movement, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Vision, Ocular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review