Cited by 336Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

Purchase and consumption habits: not necessarily what you intend

Ji, Mindy F., Wood, Wendy·2007·Journal of Consumer Psychology

Abstract

Purchase and consumption behaviors in daily life often are repetitive and performed in customary places, leading consumers to develop habits. When habits have formed, environmental cues can activate the practiced responses in the absence of conscious decision making. This research tested these ideas using a longitudinal design. We predicted that regardless of their explicit intentions, consumers would repeat habits to purchase fast food, watch TV news, and take the bus. The results yielded the anticipated pattern in which participants repeated habitual behaviors even if they reported intentions to do otherwise. Intentions only guided behavior in the absence of strong habits. This study ruled out a number of artifactual accounts for these findings including that they arise from the level of abstraction at which intentions are identified, the certainty with which participants held intentions, a restriction of range in the measures, and the strategy participants used to estimate frequency of past performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70037-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is evidence that different features of context such as physical location, time of day, mood, and presence of particular other people can be more or less important for guiding habitual behaviors of different kinds, albeit with physical location having a dominating effect.

    “There is evidence that different features of context such as the physical location, time of day, mood, and the presence of particular other people can be more or less important for guiding habitual behaviors of different kinds (e.g., purchasing fast food, watching TV news), albeit with physical location having a dominating effect (Ji and Wood, 2007).”

    From Context Stability in Habit Building Increases Automaticity and Goal Attainment (2022) · cites this paper as Ji and Wood, 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 336

Authors
Ji, M. F., & Wood, W.
Affiliations
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Ji, Mindy F.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-10
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
261-276
ISSN
  • 1057-7408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7663
OpenAlex
W2017924863
Cited by
336
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
15.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
consumption patterns, purchase behavior, consumption behavior, behavioral intention, environmental cues, automatism, fast food consumption, bus commuting, intention-behavior gap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review