CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 253Academic Writing and PublishingDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesPublishing and Scholarly Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Writing for scholarly publication in English: The case of Hong Kong

Flowerdew, John·1999·Journal of Second Language Writing
DOI 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80125-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80125-8

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carter-Sigglow, 1996, Correspondence, Nature, 384, 764
  2. Gibbs, 1995, Trends in scientific communication: lost science in the third world, Scientific American, 76
  3. Wood, 1997, International scientific English: some thoughts on science, language and ownership, Science Tribune

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 253

Related

Metadata

Authors
Flowerdew, J.
Affiliations
City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Flowerdew, John
ORCID
Flowerdew, John
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-05
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
123-145
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80125-8
OpenAlex
W2011261811
Cited by
250
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
Keywords
non-native English speakers, Cantonese speakers, English language exposure, publishing strategy, language of publication, English as a global language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review