Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?1

Scott, Daniel J, Bergen, Patricia C, Rege, Robert V, Laycock, Royce, Tesfay, Seifu T, Valentine, James R., Euhus, David M, Jeyarajah, Rohan D., Thompson, William M, Jones, Daniel B·2000·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Developing technical skill is essential to surgical training, but using the operating room for basic skill acquisition may be inefficient and expensive, especially for laparoscopic operations. This study determines if laparoscopic skills training using simulated tasks on a video-trainer improves the operative performance of surgery residents. STUDY DESIGN: Second- and third-year residents (n= 27) were prospectively randomized to receive formal laparoscopic skills training or to a control group. At baseline, residents had a validated global assessment of their ability to perform a laparoscopic cholecystectomy based on direct observation by three evaluators who were blinded to the residents' randomization status. Residents were also tested on five standardized video-trainer tasks. The training group practiced the video-trainer tasks as a group for 30 minutes daily for 10 days. The control group received no formal training. All residents repeated the video-trainer test and underwent a second global assessment by the same three blinded evaluators at the end of the 1-month rotation. Within-person improvement was determined; improvement was adjusted for differences in baseline performance. RESULTS: Five residents were unable to participate because of scheduling problems; 9 residents in the training group and 13 residents in the control group completed the study. Baseline laparoscopic experience, video-trainer scores, and global assessments were not significantly different between the two groups. The training group on average practiced the video-trainer tasks 138 times (range 94 to 171 times); the control group did not practice any task. The trained group achieved significantly greater adjusted improvement in video-trainer scores (five of five tasks) and global assessments (four of eight criteria) over the course of the four-week curriculum, compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Intense training improves video-eye-hand skills and translates into improved operative performance for junior surgery residents. Surgical curricula should contain laparoscopic skills training.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00339-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
Scott, D. J., Bergen, P. C., Rege, R. V., Laycock, R., Tesfay, S. T., Valentine, J. R., Euhus, D. M., Jeyarajah, R. D., Thompson, W. M., & Jones, D. B.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2000-09
Volume
191
Issue
3
Pages
272-283
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1511889812
Cited by
734
References
0
FWCI
15.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00339-2
The paper
Scott, D. J., Bergen, P. C., Rege, R. V., Laycock, R., Tesfay, S. T., Valentine, J. R., Euhus, D. M., Jeyarajah, R. D., Thompson, W. M., & Jones, D. B. (2000). Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience?1. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(00)00339-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.