Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 339

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The first randomized trial of human polymerized hemoglobin as a blood substitute in acute trauma and emergent surgery

Open access
Gould, Steven A, Moore, Ernest E, Hoyt, David B, Burch, Jon M, Haenel, James B, Garcia, Joan, DeWoskin, Richard, Moss, Gerald S·1998·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human polymerized hemoglobin (PolyHeme) is a universally compatible, disease-free, oxygen-carrying resuscitative fluid. This is the first prospective, randomized trial to compare directly the therapeutic benefit of PolyHeme with that of allogeneic red blood cells (RBCs) in the treatment of acute blood loss. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-four trauma patients (33 male, 11 female) aged 19-75 years with an average Injury Severity Score (ISS) score of 21+/-10 were randomized to receive red cells (n = 23) or up to 6 U (300 g) of PolyHeme (n = 21) as their initial blood replacement after trauma and during emergent operations. RESULTS: There were no serious or unexpected adverse events related to PolyHeme. The PolyHeme infusion of 4.4+/-2.0 units (mean +/- SD) resulted in a plasma [Hb] of 3.9+/-1.3 g/dL, which accounted for 40% of the total circulating [Hb]. There was no difference in total [Hb] between the groups before infusion (10.4+/-2.3 g/dL control vs. 9.4+/-1.9 g/dL experimental). At end-infusion the experimental RBC [Hb] fell to 5.8+/-2.8 g/dL vs. 10.6+/-1.8 g/dL (p < 0.05) in the control, although the total [Hb] was not different between the groups or from pre-infusion. The total number of allogeneic red cell transfusions for the control and experimental groups was 10.4+/-4.2 units vs. 6.8+/-3.9 units (p < 0.05) through day 1, and 11.3+/-4.1 units vs. 7.8 +/-4.2 units (p = 0.06) through day 3. CONCLUSIONS: PolyHeme is safe in acute blood loss, maintains total [Hb] in lieu of red cells despite the marked fall in RBC [Hb], and reduces the use of allogeneic blood. PolyHeme appears to be a clinically useful blood substitute.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00095-7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Gould, S. A., Moore, E. E., Hoyt, D. B., Burch, J. M., Haenel, J. B., Garcia, J., DeWoskin, R., & Moss, G. S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
1998-08
Volume
187
Issue
2
Pages
113-120
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978291922
Cited by
339
References
0
FWCI
22.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The first randomized trial of human polymerized hemoglobin as a blood substitute in acute trauma and emergent surgery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00095-7
The paper
Gould, S. A., Moore, E. E., Hoyt, D. B., Burch, J. M., Haenel, J. B., Garcia, J., DeWoskin, R., & Moss, G. S. (1998). The first randomized trial of human polymerized hemoglobin as a blood substitute in acute trauma and emergent surgery. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00095-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.