Impact of Surgical Resection of Rectovaginal Pouch of Douglas Endometriotic Nodules on Pelvic Pain and Some Elements of Patients' Sex Life
Abstract
Study objective To assess the impact of laparoscopic resection of endometriotic nodules in the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas on women's pain symptoms, analgesic intake, work absenteeism, work difficulties, and some elements of sex life.Design Observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).Setting Gynecology department at a university hospital.Patients Twenty-six women with rectovaginal pouch of Douglas endometriotic nodules and no evidence of other potential cause of pain at physical examination, laparoscopy, and transvaginal ultrasonography.Intervention Laparoscopic resection of endometriotic nodules with the CO2 laser until no residual induration was felt in surrounding tissues.Measurements and main results Significant statistical differences were found between preoperative and postoperative pain scores, percentages of women absent from work, percentages taking analgesics or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and percentages having work difficulties due to pain. A significant difference also was found in frequencies of sexual desire and coitus.Conclusion Endometriotic nodules in the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas may be responsible for major pelvic pain and also for sexual dysfunction (lack of sexual desire, dyspareunia). Laparoscopic resection of the nodules significantly improves these conditions. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8(1):55-60, 2001)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 65
- Authors
- Anaf, V., Simon, P., Nakadi, I. E., Simonart, T., Noel, J.-C., & Buxant, F.
- Affiliations
- Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Anaf, Vincent
- Venue
- The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-60
- ISSN
- 1074-3804 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170513816
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
- Keywords
- endometriosis, endometriotic nodules, laparoscopic resection, CO2 laser, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, sexual dysfunction, sexual desire, analgesic use, absenteeism, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Coitus, Douglas' Pouch, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior, Pelvic Pain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review