Cited by 65Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

Impact of Surgical Resection of Rectovaginal Pouch of Douglas Endometriotic Nodules on Pelvic Pain and Some Elements of Patients' Sex Life

Anaf, Vincent, Simon, Philippe, Nakadi, Issam El, Simonart, Thierry, Noel, Jean-Christophe, Buxant, Frederic·2001·The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists

Abstract

Study objective To assess the impact of laparoscopic resection of endometriotic nodules in the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas on women's pain symptoms, analgesic intake, work absenteeism, work difficulties, and some elements of sex life.Design Observational study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).Setting Gynecology department at a university hospital.Patients Twenty-six women with rectovaginal pouch of Douglas endometriotic nodules and no evidence of other potential cause of pain at physical examination, laparoscopy, and transvaginal ultrasonography.Intervention Laparoscopic resection of endometriotic nodules with the CO2 laser until no residual induration was felt in surrounding tissues.Measurements and main results Significant statistical differences were found between preoperative and postoperative pain scores, percentages of women absent from work, percentages taking analgesics or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and percentages having work difficulties due to pain. A significant difference also was found in frequencies of sexual desire and coitus.Conclusion Endometriotic nodules in the rectovaginal pouch of Douglas may be responsible for major pelvic pain and also for sexual dysfunction (lack of sexual desire, dyspareunia). Laparoscopic resection of the nodules significantly improves these conditions. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8(1):55-60, 2001)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60549-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 65

Authors
Anaf, V., Simon, P., Nakadi, I. E., Simonart, T., Noel, J.-C., & Buxant, F.
Affiliations
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
Corresponding author
Anaf, Vincent
Venue
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
55-60
ISSN
1074-3804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170513816
Cited by
65
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis, endometriotic nodules, laparoscopic resection, CO2 laser, pelvic pain, dyspareunia, sexual dysfunction, sexual desire, analgesic use, absenteeism, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
MeSH terms
Adult, Coitus, Douglas' Pouch, Endometriosis, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy, Quality of Life, Sexual Behavior, Pelvic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review