Cited by 251Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsSynthesis and biological activityCancer Treatment and Pharmacology

Dissecting cellular processes using small molecules: identification of colchicine-like, taxol-like and other small molecules that perturb mitosis

Open access
Haggarty, Stephen J, Mayer, Thomas U, Miyamoto, David T, Fathi, Reza, King, Randall W, Mitchison, Timothy J, Schreiber, Stuart L·2000·Chemistry & Biology

Abstract

Background Understanding the molecular mechanisms of complex cellular processes requires unbiased means to identify and to alter conditionally gene products that function in a pathway of interest. Although random mutagenesis and screening (forward genetics) provide a useful means to this end, the complexity of the genome, long generation time and redundancy of gene function have limited their use with mammalian systems. We sought to develop an analogous process using small molecules to modulate conditionally the function of proteins. We hoped to identify simultaneously small molecules that may serve as leads for the development of therapeutically useful agents.Results We report the results of a high-throughput, phenotype-based screen for identifying cell-permeable small molecules that affect mitosis of mammalian cells. The predominant class of compounds that emerged directly alters the stability of microtubules in the mitotic spindle. Although many of these compounds show the colchicine-like property of destabilizing microtubules, one member shows the taxol-like property of stabilizing microtubules. Another class of compounds alters chromosome segregation by novel mechanisms that do not involve direct interactions with microtubules.Conclusions The identification of structurally diverse small molecules that affect the mammalian mitotic machinery from a large library of synthetic compounds illustrates the use of chemical genetics in dissecting an essential cellular pathway. This screen identified five compounds that affect mitosis without directly targeting microtubules. Understanding the mechanism of action of these compounds, along with future screening efforts, promises to help elucidate the molecular mechanisms involved in chromosome segregation during mitosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1074-5521(00)00101-0

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Synstab A promotes microtubule formation by functioning as a molecular glue.

    “Synstab A is a simple synthetic compound discovered in 2001 that, by functioning as a MG, promotes microtubule formation.104”

    From Chasing molecular glue degraders: screening approaches (2022) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 251

Authors
Haggarty, S. J., Mayer, T. U., Miyamoto, D. T., Fathi, R., King, R. W., Mitchison, T. J., & Schreiber, S. L.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Schreiber, Stuart L
Venue
Chemistry & Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
275-286
ISSN
1074-5521 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055992184
Cited by
251
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemistry & Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • National Cancer Institute (1 P01 CA78048-01, P01CA078048)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and biological activity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Keywords
chemical genetics, mitosis, microtubule stabilization, microtubule destabilization, mitotic spindle, chromosome segregation, small molecule screening, synthetic compound libraries, mammalian cells
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Chromosomes, Colchicine, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Microtubules, Mitosis, Spindle Apparatus, Tubulin, Molecular Structure, Paclitaxel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review